These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 356618)

  • 1. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives.
    Zachrisson BU; Brobakken BO
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Jul; 74(1):62-78. PubMed ID: 356618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics.
    Zachrisson BJ
    Am J Orthod; 1977 Feb; 71(2):173-89. PubMed ID: 319678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with the custom base indirect bonding technique.
    Yagci A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 19752016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of modifying the adhesive composition on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Laffoon J; Warren J
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):464-7. PubMed ID: 12401056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative assessment of bonding time and 1-year bracket survival using flash-free and conventional adhesives for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Grünheid T; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Nov; 154(5):621-628. PubMed ID: 30384932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin.
    Norevall LI; Marcusson A; Persson M
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Aug; 18(4):373-84. PubMed ID: 8921659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Keizer S; ten Cate JM; Arends J
    Am J Orthod; 1976 Mar; 69(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 766645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of fourteen direct-bonding orthodontic bases.
    Dickinson PT; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Dec; 78(6):630-9. PubMed ID: 7006404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical applications of direct orthodontic bonding systems.
    Whitehill-Grayson IT
    Dent Clin North Am; 1981 Apr; 25(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 7018940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of an adhesive resin for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 16(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 8181547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times.
    Carstensen W
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Jan; 89(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 2934986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of an indirect bonding technique in reducing plaque accumulation around braces.
    Dalessandri D; Dalessandri M; Bonetti S; Visconti L; Paganelli C
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 21848408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding and debonding with a light-activated resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    Fricker JP
    Aust Orthod J; 1996 Mar; 14(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 9063113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bond strength of light-cure fluoride-releasing base-liners as orthodontic bracket adhesives.
    McCourt JW; Cooley RL; Barnwell S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Jul; 100(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2069147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shear bond strength of a new polycarbonate bracket--an in vitro study with 14 adhesives.
    Akin-Nergiz N; Nergiz I; Behlfelt K; Platzer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Jun; 18(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 8791893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of retention rates of brackets with thermally-cured and light-cured custom bases in indirect bonding procedures.
    Miles PG
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Jul; 16(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 11201964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques regarding time length and bracket detachment.
    Bozelli JV; Bigliazzi R; Barbosa HA; Ortolani CL; Bertoz FA; Faltin Junior K
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):51-7. PubMed ID: 24351150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.