These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35662362)

  • 1. Optimal reaching trajectories based on feedforward control.
    Taniai Y; Naniwa T; Nishii J
    Biol Cybern; 2022 Aug; 116(4):517-526. PubMed ID: 35662362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of trajectory planning models for arm-reaching movements based on energy cost.
    Nishii J; Taniai Y
    Neural Comput; 2009 Sep; 21(9):2634-47. PubMed ID: 19548798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimality of Upper-Arm Reaching Trajectories Based on the Expected Value of the Metabolic Energy Cost.
    Taniai Y; Nishii J
    Neural Comput; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1721-37. PubMed ID: 26079750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal Feedback Control for the Proportion of Energy Cost in the Upper-Arm Reaching Movement.
    Taniai Y
    Neural Comput; 2023 Oct; 35(11):1870-1880. PubMed ID: 37725709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whole-Body Reaching Movements Formulated by Minimum Muscle-Tension Change Criterion.
    Kudo N; Choi K; Kagawa T; Uno Y
    Neural Comput; 2016 May; 28(5):950-69. PubMed ID: 26942751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal control of antagonistic muscle stiffness during voluntary movements.
    Lan N; Crago PE
    Biol Cybern; 1994; 71(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 8068774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stochastic optimal feedforward-feedback control determines timing and variability of arm movements with or without vision.
    Berret B; Conessa A; Schweighofer N; Burdet E
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jun; 17(6):e1009047. PubMed ID: 34115757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of an optimal control model of multi-joint arm movements.
    Lan N
    Biol Cybern; 1997 Feb; 76(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 9116076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The minimum endpoint variance trajectory depends on the profile of the signal-dependent noise.
    Iguchi N; Sakaguchi Y; Ishida F
    Biol Cybern; 2005 Apr; 92(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 15765212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study.
    Wolpert DM; Ghahramani Z; Jordan MI
    Exp Brain Res; 1995; 103(3):460-70. PubMed ID: 7789452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trajectory formation based on physiological characteristics of skeletal muscles.
    Kashima T; Isurugi Y
    Biol Cybern; 1998 Jun; 78(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 9711815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Minimum torque-change model.
    Uno Y; Kawato M; Suzuki R
    Biol Cybern; 1989; 61(2):89-101. PubMed ID: 2742921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are complex control signals required for human arm movement?
    Gribble PL; Ostry DJ; Sanguineti V; Laboissière R
    J Neurophysiol; 1998 Mar; 79(3):1409-24. PubMed ID: 9497421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online corrective responses following target jump in altered gravitoinertial force field point to nested feedforward and feedback control.
    Chomienne L; Blouin J; Bringoux L
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jan; 125(1):154-165. PubMed ID: 33174494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinematic feedback control laws for generating natural arm movements.
    Kim D; Jang C; Park FC
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2014 Mar; 9(1):016002. PubMed ID: 24343165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative examinations for multi joint arm trajectory planning--using a robust calculation algorithm of the minimum commanded torque change trajectory.
    Wada Y; Kaneko Y; Nakano E; Osu R; Kawato M
    Neural Netw; 2001 May; 14(4-5):381-93. PubMed ID: 11411627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model for learning human reaching movements.
    Karniel A; Inbar GF
    Biol Cybern; 1997 Sep; 77(3):173-83. PubMed ID: 9352631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements.
    Flash T
    Biol Cybern; 1987; 57(4-5):257-74. PubMed ID: 3689835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feedforward impedance control efficiently reduce motor variability.
    Osu R; Morishige K; Miyamoto H; Kawato M
    Neurosci Res; 2009 Sep; 65(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 19523999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model.
    Nakano E; Imamizu H; Osu R; Uno Y; Gomi H; Yoshioka T; Kawato M
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 May; 81(5):2140-55. PubMed ID: 10322055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.