These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35662623)

  • 21. Causal Modeling to Mitigate Selection Bias and Unmeasured Confounding in Internet-Based Epidemiology of COVID-19: Model Development and Validation.
    Stockham N; Washington P; Chrisman B; Paskov K; Jung JY; Wall DP
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2022 Jul; 8(7):e31306. PubMed ID: 35605128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs.
    Digitale JC; Martin JN; Glymour MM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 142():264-267. PubMed ID: 34371103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Directed Acyclic Graphs in Surgical Research.
    Gongola A; Bradshaw JC
    J Surg Res; 2023 Feb; 282():285-288. PubMed ID: 36045022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Causal Inference in Medicine Part II. Directed acyclic graphs--a useful method for confounder selection, categorization of potential biases, and hypothesis specification].
    Suzuki E; Komatsu H; Yorifuji T; Yamamoto E; Doi H; Tsuda T
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 64(4):796-805. PubMed ID: 19797848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations.
    Tennant PWG; Murray EJ; Arnold KF; Berrie L; Fox MP; Gadd SC; Harrison WJ; Keeble C; Ranker LR; Textor J; Tomova GD; Gilthorpe MS; Ellison GTH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 50(2):620-632. PubMed ID: 33330936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Matched designs and causal diagrams.
    Mansournia MA; Hernán MA; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 42(3):860-9. PubMed ID: 23918854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 19366394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. "Toward a clearer definition of confounding" revisited with directed acyclic graphs.
    Howards PP; Schisterman EF; Poole C; Kaufman JS; Weinberg CR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 22904203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A counterfactual approach to bias and effect modification in terms of response types.
    Suzuki E; Mitsuhashi T; Tsuda T; Yamamoto E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():101. PubMed ID: 23902658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in identifying and controlling confounding bias].
    Liu HX; Wang HB; Wang N
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 41(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 32344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Directed acyclic graphs: An under-utilized tool for child maltreatment research.
    Austin AE; Desrosiers TA; Shanahan ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2019 May; 91():78-87. PubMed ID: 30836237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using compartmental models to simulate directed acyclic graphs to explore competing causal mechanisms underlying epidemiological study data.
    Havumaki J; Eisenberg MC
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Jun; 17(167):20190675. PubMed ID: 32574536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methodological Challenges When Studying Distance to Care as an Exposure in Health Research.
    Caniglia EC; Zash R; Swanson SA; Wirth KE; Diseko M; Mayondi G; Lockman S; Mmalane M; Makhema J; Dryden-Peterson S; Kponee-Shovein KZ; John O; Murray EJ; Shapiro RL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 188(9):1674-1681. PubMed ID: 31107529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reducing bias in pelvic floor disorders research: using directed acyclic graphs as an aid.
    Sung VW
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2012 Jan; 31(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21826724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of Causal Diagrams to Inform the Design and Interpretation of Observational Studies: An Example from the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP).
    Staplin N; Herrington WG; Judge PK; Reith CA; Haynes R; Landray MJ; Baigent C; Emberson J
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 12(3):546-552. PubMed ID: 27553952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using Directed Acyclic Graphs to detect limitations of traditional regression in longitudinal studies.
    Moodie EE; Stephens DA
    Int J Public Health; 2010 Dec; 55(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 20838848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interpreting mutual adjustment for multiple indicators of socioeconomic position without committing mutual adjustment fallacies.
    Green MJ; Popham F
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):10. PubMed ID: 30606167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reflection on modern methods: causal inference considerations for heterogeneous disease etiology.
    Nevo D; Ogino S; Wang M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 50(3):1030-1037. PubMed ID: 33484125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the causal interpretation of race in regressions adjusting for confounding and mediating variables.
    VanderWeele TJ; Robinson WR
    Epidemiology; 2014 Jul; 25(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 24887159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neighborhood-level confounding in epidemiologic studies: unavoidable challenges, uncertain solutions.
    Chaix B; Leal C; Evans D
    Epidemiology; 2010 Jan; 21(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 19907336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.