173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35664297)
1. Improvement of Genomic Predictions in Small Breeds by Construction of Genomic Relationship Matrix Through Variable Selection.
Mancin E; Mota LFM; Tuliozi B; Verdiglione R; Mantovani R; Sartori C
Front Genet; 2022; 13():814264. PubMed ID: 35664297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes.
Clark SA; Hickey JM; Daetwyler HD; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Feb; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 22321529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of pedigree and genomic predictions of carcass and novel meat quality traits in multi-breed sheep data assessed by cross-validation.
Daetwyler HD; Swan AA; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Nov; 44(1):33. PubMed ID: 23146144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic Prediction in Local Breeds: The Rendena Cattle as a Case Study.
Mancin E; Tuliozi B; Sartori C; Guzzo N; Mantovani R
Animals (Basel); 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34207091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strategies for genomic predictions of an indicine multi-breed population using single-step GBLUP.
Londoño-Gil M; López-Correa R; Aguilar I; Magnabosco CU; Hidalgo J; Bussiman F; Baldi F; Lourenco D
J Anim Breed Genet; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38812461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of a genomic relationship matrix for breed assignment of cattle breeds: comparison and combination with a machine learning method.
Wilmot H; Niehoff T; Soyeurt H; Gengler N; Calus MPL
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37220912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic analysis for managing small and endangered populations: a case study in Tyrol Grey cattle.
Mészáros G; Boison SA; Pérez O'Brien AM; Ferenčaković M; Curik I; Da Silva MV; Utsunomiya YT; Garcia JF; Sölkner J
Front Genet; 2015; 6():173. PubMed ID: 26074948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle.
Gualdrón Duarte JL; Gori AS; Hubin X; Lourenco D; Charlier C; Misztal I; Druet T
BMC Genomics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):545. PubMed ID: 32762654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Within- and across-breed genomic predictions and genomic relationships for Western Pyrenees dairy sheep breeds Latxa, Manech, and Basco-Béarnaise.
Legarra A; Baloche G; Barillet F; Astruc JM; Soulas C; Aguerre X; Arrese F; Mintegi L; Lasarte M; Maeztu F; Beltrán de Heredia I; Ugarte E
J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):3200-12. PubMed ID: 24630656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.
Steyn Y; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 97(11):4418-4427. PubMed ID: 31539424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
