These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35664297)

  • 41. Fine tuning genomic evaluations in dairy cattle through SNP pre-selection with the Elastic-Net algorithm.
    Croiseau P; Legarra A; Guillaume F; Fritz S; Baur A; Colombani C; Robert-Granié C; Boichard D; Ducrocq V
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Dec; 93(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 22189606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cow genotyping strategies for genomic selection in a small dairy cattle population.
    Jenko J; Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Eaglen SAE; Luff WGL; Bichard M; Pong-Wong R; Woolliams JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):439-452. PubMed ID: 27837974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality.
    Bermann M; Legarra A; Hollifield MK; Masuda Y; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Jan; 138(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 32985749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle.
    Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6299-6310. PubMed ID: 32418688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Validation of single-step genomic predictions using the linear regression method for milk yield and heat tolerance in a Thai-Holstein population.
    Sungkhapreecha P; Misztal I; Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Buaban S; Chankitisakul V; Boonkum W
    Vet World; 2021 Dec; 14(12):3119-3125. PubMed ID: 35153401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Response to genomic selection: the Bulmer effect and the potential of genomic selection when the number of phenotypic records is limiting.
    Van Grevenhof EM; Van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):26. PubMed ID: 22862849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle.
    Campos GS; Reimann FA; Cardoso LL; Ferreira CER; Junqueira VS; Schmidt PI; Braccini Neto J; Yokoo MJI; Sollero BP; Boligon AA; Cardoso FF
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2579-2595. PubMed ID: 29741705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
    Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of joint versus purebred genomic evaluation in the French multi-breed dairy goat population.
    Carillier C; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):67. PubMed ID: 25927866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.
    Porto-Neto LR; Barendse W; Henshall JM; McWilliam SM; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():84. PubMed ID: 26525050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels.
    Zhang Z; Ding X; Liu J; Zhang Q; de Koning DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3642-50. PubMed ID: 21700054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Genomic predictions based on a joint reference population for the Nordic Red cattle breeds.
    Zhou L; Heringstad B; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Grove H; Nielsen US; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(7):4485-96. PubMed ID: 24792791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.
    van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC
    BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accuracy of genomic selection for age at puberty in a multi-breed population of tropically adapted beef cattle.
    Farah MM; Swan AA; Fortes MR; Fonseca R; Moore SS; Kelly MJ
    Anim Genet; 2016 Feb; 47(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26490440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Genomic prediction of breeding values in the New Zealand sheep industry using a 50K SNP chip.
    Auvray B; McEwan JC; Newman SA; Lee M; Dodds KG
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4375-89. PubMed ID: 25149326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.