These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
49. Validation of single-step genomic predictions using the linear regression method for milk yield and heat tolerance in a Thai-Holstein population. Sungkhapreecha P; Misztal I; Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Buaban S; Chankitisakul V; Boonkum W Vet World; 2021 Dec; 14(12):3119-3125. PubMed ID: 35153401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Response to genomic selection: the Bulmer effect and the potential of genomic selection when the number of phenotypic records is limiting. Van Grevenhof EM; Van Arendonk JA; Bijma P Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):26. PubMed ID: 22862849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle. Campos GS; Reimann FA; Cardoso LL; Ferreira CER; Junqueira VS; Schmidt PI; Braccini Neto J; Yokoo MJI; Sollero BP; Boligon AA; Cardoso FF J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2579-2595. PubMed ID: 29741705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups. Naderi S; Yin T; König S J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of joint versus purebred genomic evaluation in the French multi-breed dairy goat population. Carillier C; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):67. PubMed ID: 25927866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection. Porto-Neto LR; Barendse W; Henshall JM; McWilliam SM; Lehnert SA; Reverter A Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():84. PubMed ID: 26525050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels. Zhang Z; Ding X; Liu J; Zhang Q; de Koning DJ J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3642-50. PubMed ID: 21700054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Genomic predictions based on a joint reference population for the Nordic Red cattle breeds. Zhou L; Heringstad B; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Grove H; Nielsen US; Lund MS J Dairy Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(7):4485-96. PubMed ID: 24792791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP. van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracy of genomic selection for age at puberty in a multi-breed population of tropically adapted beef cattle. Farah MM; Swan AA; Fortes MR; Fonseca R; Moore SS; Kelly MJ Anim Genet; 2016 Feb; 47(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26490440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Genomic prediction of breeding values in the New Zealand sheep industry using a 50K SNP chip. Auvray B; McEwan JC; Newman SA; Lee M; Dodds KG J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4375-89. PubMed ID: 25149326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix. Tiezzi F; Maltecca C Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]