These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35664957)

  • 1. Development and evaluation of an advanced National Air Quality Forecasting Capability using the NOAA Global Forecast System version 16.
    Campbell PC; Tang Y; Lee P; Baker B; Tong D; Saylor R; Stein A; Huang J; Huang HC; Strobach E; McQueen J; Pan L; Stajner I; Sims J; Tirado-Delgado J; Jung Y; Yang F; Spero TL; Gilliam RC
    Geosci Model Dev; 2022 Apr; 15(8):3281-3313. PubMed ID: 35664957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the offline-coupled GFSv15-FV3-CMAQv5.0.2 in support of the next-generation National Air Quality Forecast Capability over the contiguous United States.
    Chen X; Zhang Y; Wang K; Tong D; Lee P; Tang Y; Huang J; Campbell PC; Mcqueen J; Pye HOT; Murphy BN; Kang D
    Geosci Model Dev; 2021 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 34367521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human-model hybrid Korean air quality forecasting system.
    Chang LS; Cho A; Park H; Nam K; Kim D; Hong JH; Song CK
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):896-911. PubMed ID: 27450767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1.
    Appel KW; Napelenok SL; Foley KM; Pye HOT; Hogrefe C; Luecken DJ; Bash JO; Roselle SJ; Pleim JE; Foroutan H; Hutzell WT; Pouliot GA; Sarwar G; Fahey KM; Gantt B; Gilliam RC; Heath NK; Kang D; Mathur R; Schwede DB; Spero TL; Wong DC; Young JO
    Geosci Model Dev; 2017; 10(4):1703-1732. PubMed ID: 30147852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of two-way and offline coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over the contiguous US: performance evaluation and impacts of chemistry-meteorology feedbacks on air quality.
    Wang K; Zhang Y; Yu S; Wong DC; Pleim J; Mathur R; Kelly JT; Bell M
    Geosci Model Dev; 2021 Nov; 14(11):7189-7221. PubMed ID: 35237388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of NAQFC model performance in forecasting surface ozone during the 2011 DISCOVER-AQ campaign.
    Garner GG; Thompson AM; Lee P; Martins DK
    J Atmos Chem; 2015; 72(3-4):483-501. PubMed ID: 26692599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and implementation of a remote-sensing and in situ data-assimilating version of CMAQ for operational PM2.5 forecasting. Part 1: MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) data-assimilation design and testing.
    McHenry JN; Vukovich JM; Hsu NC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Dec; 65(12):1395-412. PubMed ID: 26422145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. WRF-SMOKE-CMAQ modeling system for air quality evaluation in São Paulo megacity with a 2008 experimental campaign data.
    de Almeida Albuquerque TT; de Fátima Andrade M; Ynoue RY; Moreira DM; Andreão WL; Dos Santos FS; Nascimento EGS
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Dec; 25(36):36555-36569. PubMed ID: 30374719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation.
    Appel KW; Bash JO; Fahey KM; Foley KM; Gilliam RC; Hogrefe C; Hutzell WT; Kang D; Mathur R; Murphy BN; Napelenok SL; Nolte CG; Pleim JE; Pouliot GA; Pye HOT; Ran L; Roselle SJ; Sarwar G; Schwede DB; Sidi FI; Spero TL; Wong DC
    Geosci Model Dev; 2021 May; 14():2867-2897. PubMed ID: 34676058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation and application of sub-grid-scale plume treatment in the latest version of EPA's third-generation air quality model, CMAQ 5.01.
    Karamchandani P; Johnson J; Yarwood G; Knipping E
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Apr; 64(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 24843916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PM
    Ho CH; Park I; Kim J; Lee JB
    Asia Pac J Atmos Sci; 2022 Sep; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 36157837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Updates to the Noah Land Surface Model in WRF-CMAQ to Improve Simulated Meteorology, Air Quality, and Deposition.
    Campbell PC; Bash JO; Spero TL
    J Adv Model Earth Syst; 2019 Jan; 11(1):231-256. PubMed ID: 31007838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of US wildland fires on ozone and particulate matter: a comparison of measurements and CMAQ model predictions from 2008 to 2012.
    Wilkins JL; Pouliot G; Foley K; Appel W; Pierce T
    Int J Wildland Fire; 2018; 27(10):. PubMed ID: 33424209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application and evaluation of two air quality models for particulate matter for a southeastern U.S. episode.
    Zhang Y; Pun B; Wu SY; Vijayaraghavan K; Seigneur C
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Dec; 54(12):1478-93. PubMed ID: 15648386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Synergistic aircraft and ground observations of transported wildfire smoke and its impact on air quality in New York City during the summer 2018 LISTOS campaign.
    Wu Y; Nehrir AR; Ren X; Dickerson RR; Huang J; Stratton PR; Gronoff G; Kooi SA; Collins JE; Berkoff TA; Lei L; Gross B; Moshary F
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 773():145030. PubMed ID: 33940711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The FireWork air quality forecast system with near-real-time biomass burning emissions: Recent developments and evaluation of performance for the 2015 North American wildfire season.
    Pavlovic R; Chen J; Anderson K; Moran MD; Beaulieu PA; Davignon D; Cousineau S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):819-41. PubMed ID: 26934496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the impact of fine particulate matter (PM
    Weber SA; Insaf TZ; Hall ES; Talbot TO; Huff AK
    Environ Res; 2016 Nov; 151():399-409. PubMed ID: 27543787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observations and impacts of transported Canadian wildfire smoke on ozone and aerosol air quality in the Maryland region on June 9-12, 2015.
    Dreessen J; Sullivan J; Delgado R
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):842-62. PubMed ID: 26963934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance and diagnostic evaluation of ozone predictions by the Eta-Community Multiscale Air Quality Forecast System during the 2002 New England Air Quality Study.
    Yu S; Mathur R; Kang D; Schere K; Eder B; Pleim J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Oct; 56(10):1459-71. PubMed ID: 17063868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.