These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35666287)

  • 21. Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Placement of Synthetic Mesh at Time of Sacrocolpopexy.
    Nosti PA; Carter CM; Sokol AI; Tefera E; Iglesia CB; Park AJ; Gutman RE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 26571429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long term follow-up after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Khalil N; Moubarak M; Alkassis M; Kassis N; Moukarzel M; Atallah D
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jun; 34(6):1279-1283. PubMed ID: 36576540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rate of Mesh Erosion After Sacrocolpopexy With Concurrent Supracervical Compared With Total Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nassif J; Yadav GS; Orejuela FJ; Turrentine MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 140(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 35926201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy.
    Thomas TN; Davidson ERW; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 32253489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mesh Exposure After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    van Zanten F; van Iersel JJ; Hartog FE; Aalders KIM; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):636-642. PubMed ID: 29964179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of Age on Complications Rate and Surgical Outcomes in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy.
    Gluck O; Rusavy Z; Grinstein E; Abdelkhalek Y; Deval B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):753-758. PubMed ID: 35123043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Polypropylene Mesh Predicts Mesh/Suture Exposure After Sacrocolpopexy Independent of Known Risk Factors: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.
    Durst PJ; Heit MH
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(5):360-366. PubMed ID: 28657987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reoperations for mesh-related complications after pelvic organ prolapse repair: 8-year experience at a tertiary referral center.
    Warembourg S; Labaki M; de Tayrac R; Costa P; Fatton B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1139-1151. PubMed ID: 28150032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA; Luber KM; Nager CW; Lukacz ES
    Int Urogynecol J; 2011 Feb; 22(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 20842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-term mesh exposure after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy.
    Crane AK; Geller EJ; Sullivan S; Robinson BL; Myers EM; Horton C; Matthews CA
    South Med J; 2014 Oct; 107(10):603-6. PubMed ID: 25279861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. One-Year Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Kenton K; Mueller ER; Tarney C; Bresee C; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):382-4. PubMed ID: 27403758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients.
    Stepanian AA; Miklos JR; Moore RD; Mattox TF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 18312989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term Data on Graft-Related Complications After Sacrocolpopexy With Lightweight Compared With Heavier-Weight Mesh.
    Page AS; Cattani L; Pacquée S; Claerhout F; Callewaert G; Housmans S; Van der Aa F; D'Hoore A; Deprest J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 141(1):189-198. PubMed ID: 36701619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laparoscopic excision and re-attachment of sacrocolpopexy mesh.
    Malekzadeh M; Ramirez-Caban L; Hurtado E
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Dec; 32(12):3301-3303. PubMed ID: 34003310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.