These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3566640)
1. Peer review in the hospitals of The Netherlands. Kistemaker WJ Aust Clin Rev; 1987 Mar; 7(24):16-20. PubMed ID: 3566640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality improvement of patient care: some preliminary results of a hospital-wide quality-assurance project at the University Hospital of Maastricht. van der Horst A; van Wijmen FC; van Dijk PH Aust Clin Rev; 1987 Mar; 7(24):21-5. PubMed ID: 3566642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The operation of a neonatal review committee in a rural hospital. Mourik P Aust Clin Rev; 1982 Jun; (5):13-4. PubMed ID: 7168700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical staff; why and how should bylaws be revised? Blaes SM Hospitals; 1973 Dec; 47(23):100-2 passim. PubMed ID: 4761618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospitalists. A specialty coming into its own. Thrall TH Hosp Health Netw; 2003 Nov; 77(11):66-70, 2. PubMed ID: 14669569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary. Rosensaft J Man Med; 1978; 3(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10316738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation. Himmelsbach CK; Sliwinski AJ; Lorber M; Mossman KL Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 10316736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review promotes professional growth. Patterson P OR Manager; 1992 Feb; 8(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 10116555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospital peer review committees: privileges of confidentiality and immunity. Butler RE Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1983 Sep; 5(7):7-31. PubMed ID: 10262536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary. George R Man Med; 1978; 3(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 10316737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Peer review: is one-eye king?]. de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital peer review standards and due process: moving from tort doctrine toward contract principles based on clinical practice guidelines. Van Tassel K Seton Hall Law Rev; 2006; 36(4):1179-256. PubMed ID: 16881165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Are we overwhelming physicians with medical record review? Spath PL J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10289611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An innovative approach to peer review for the advanced practice nurse--a focus on critical incidents. Kenny KJ; Baker L; Lanzon M; Stevens LR; Yancy M J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 Jul; 20(7):376-81. PubMed ID: 18638177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]