BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35666836)

  • 1. Evaluation of specific absorption rate and heating in children exposed to a 7T MRI head coil.
    Malik SJ; Hand JW; Carmichael DW; Hajnal JV
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Sep; 88(3):1434-1449. PubMed ID: 35666836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Specific absorption rate and temperature in neonate models resulting from exposure to a 7T head coil.
    Malik SJ; Hand JW; Satnarine R; Price AN; Hajnal JV
    Magn Reson Med; 2021 Sep; 86(3):1299-1313. PubMed ID: 33811667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 7T MR Thermometry technique for validation of system-predicted SAR with a home-built radiofrequency wrist coil.
    Fagan AJ; Jacobs PS; Hulshizer TC; Rossman PJ; Frick MA; Amrami KK; Felmlee JP
    Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):781-790. PubMed ID: 33294999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiofrequency heating induced by 7T head MRI: thermal assessment using discrete vasculature or Pennes' bioheat equation.
    van Lier AL; Kotte AN; Raaymakers BW; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 35(4):795-803. PubMed ID: 22068916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RF safety assessment of a bilateral four-channel transmit/receive 7 Tesla breast coil: SAR versus tissue temperature limits.
    Fiedler TM; Ladd ME; Bitz AK
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):143-157. PubMed ID: 28102957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A numerical and experimental study of RF shimming in the presence of hip prostheses using adaptive SAR at 3 T.
    Destruel A; Fuentes M; Weber E; O'Brien K; Jin J; Liu F; Barth M; Crozier S
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Jun; 81(6):3826-3839. PubMed ID: 30803001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T.
    Kazemivalipour E; Sadeghi-Tarakameh A; Keil B; Eryaman Y; Atalar E; Golestanirad L
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280655. PubMed ID: 36701285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electromagnetic simulation of RF burn injuries occurring at skin-skin and skin-bore wall contact points in an MRI scanner with a birdcage coil.
    Tang M; Okamoto K; Haruyama T; Yamamoto T
    Phys Med; 2021 Feb; 82():219-227. PubMed ID: 33657471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive SAR mass-averaging framework to improve predictions of local RF heating near a hip implant for parallel transmit at 7 T.
    Destruel A; O'Brien K; Jin J; Liu F; Barth M; Crozier S
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Jan; 81(1):615-627. PubMed ID: 30058186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Actual patient position versus safety models: Specific Absorption Rate implications of initial head position for Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Kopanoglu E
    NMR Biomed; 2023 May; 36(5):e4876. PubMed ID: 36385447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of respiratory motion on electromagnetic fields and specific absorption rate in cardiac imaging at 7T.
    Schoen N; Seifert F; Petzold J; Metzger GJ; Speck O; Ittermann B; Schmitter S
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Dec; 88(6):2645-2661. PubMed ID: 35906923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of increase in dielectric values on specific absorption rate (SAR) in eye and head tissues following 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz radio frequency (RF) exposure.
    Keshvari J; Keshvari R; Lang S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1463-77. PubMed ID: 16510956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulation of SAR Induced Heating in Infants undergoing 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Kowal R; Prier M; Pannicke E; Vick R; Rose G; Speck O
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():3382-3386. PubMed ID: 34891965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical Simulations of Realistic Lead Trajectories and an Experimental Verification Support the Efficacy of Parallel Radiofrequency Transmission to Reduce Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants during MRI.
    McElcheran CE; Golestanirad L; Iacono MI; Wei PS; Yang B; Anderson KJT; Bonmassar G; Graham SJ
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):2124. PubMed ID: 30765724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bench to bore ramifications of inter-subject head differences on RF shimming and specific absorption rates at 7T.
    Hardy BM; Banik R; Yan X; Anderson AW
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Oct; 92():187-196. PubMed ID: 35842192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation into the minimum number of tissue groups required for 7T in-silico parallel transmit electromagnetic safety simulations in the human head.
    de Buck MHS; Jezzard P; Jeong H; Hess AT
    Magn Reson Med; 2021 Feb; 85(2):1114-1122. PubMed ID: 32845034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of RF coils and SAR supervision strategies for clinically applicable nonselective parallel-transmit pulses at 7 T.
    Herrler J; Williams SN; Liebig P; Ding B; McElhinney P; Allwood-Spiers S; Meixner CR; Gunamony S; Maier A; Dörfler A; Gumbrecht R; Porter DA; Nagel AM
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1888-1900. PubMed ID: 36622945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of coil dimensions and field polarization on RF heating inside a head phantom.
    Kangarlu A; Ibrahim TS; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jan; 23(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 15733788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and evaluation of a hybrid radiofrequency applicator for magnetic resonance imaging and RF induced hyperthermia: electromagnetic field simulations up to 14.0 Tesla and proof-of-concept at 7.0 Tesla.
    Winter L; Özerdem C; Hoffmann W; Santoro D; Müller A; Waiczies H; Seemann R; Graessl A; Wust P; Niendorf T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61661. PubMed ID: 23613896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants during MRI in 1.2 T vertical scanners versus 1.5 T horizontal systems: A simulation study with realistic lead configurations.
    Kazemivalipour E; Vu J; Lin S; Bhusal B; Thanh Nguyen B; Kirsch J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Atalar E; Golestanirad L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():6143-6146. PubMed ID: 33019373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.