These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35667256)

  • 1. Implicit intention communication as a design opportunity for automated vehicles: Understanding drivers' interpretation of vehicle trajectory at narrow passages.
    Miller L; Leitner J; Kraus J; Baumann M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Aug; 173():106691. PubMed ID: 35667256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.
    Rettenmaier M; Dinkel S; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103438. PubMed ID: 33895469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver-Automated Vehicle Interaction in Mixed Traffic: Types of Interaction and Drivers' Driving Styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):544-561. PubMed ID: 35469464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sharing roads with automated vehicles: A questionnaire investigation from drivers', cyclists' and pedestrians' perspectives.
    Li X; Kaye SA; Afghari AP; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107093. PubMed ID: 37150131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of assignments of dedicated automated vehicle lanes and inter-vehicle distances of automated vehicle platoons on car-following performance of nearby manual vehicle drivers.
    Chen F; Lu G; Tan H; Liu M; Wan H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106826. PubMed ID: 36081223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deceleration parameters as implicit communication signals for pedestrians' crossing decisions and estimations of automated vehicle behaviour.
    Tian K; Tzigieras A; Wei C; Lee YM; Holmes C; Leonetti M; Merat N; Romano R; Markkula G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107173. PubMed ID: 37336051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of eHMI Malfunctions on Younger and Elderly Pedestrians' Trust and Acceptance of Automated Vehicle Communication Signals.
    Hensch AC; Kreißig I; Beggiato M; Krems JF
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():866475. PubMed ID: 35592174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidance-oriented advanced curve speed warning system in a connected vehicle environment.
    Wang S; Wang Y; Zheng Q; Li Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105801. PubMed ID: 33128990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian's Perspective.
    Lau M; Jipp M; Oehl M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106641. PubMed ID: 35390700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.
    Rasch A; Panero G; Boda CN; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105494. PubMed ID: 32203729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward a Holistic Communication Approach to an Automated Vehicle's Communication With Pedestrians: Combining Vehicle Kinematics With External Human-Machine Interfaces for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles.
    Lau M; Jipp M; Oehl M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():882394. PubMed ID: 35967627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated vehicles that communicate implicitly: examining the use of lateral position within the lane.
    Sripada A; Bazilinskyy P; de Winter J
    Ergonomics; 2021 Nov; 64(11):1416-1428. PubMed ID: 33950791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploration of the intelligent control system of autonomous vehicles based on edge computing.
    Ming G
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281294. PubMed ID: 36730359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How Do Human-Driven Vehicles Avoid Pedestrians in Interactive Environments? A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Sun S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z; Deng P; Tian K; Wei C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Take-Over Intention during Conditionally Automated Driving in China: Current Situation and Influencing Factors.
    Feng Z; Li J; Xu X; Guo A; Huang C; Jiang X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research on Vehicle Trajectory Deviation Characteristics on Freeways Using Natural Driving Trajectory Data.
    Dai Z; Pan C; Xiong W; Ding R; Zhang H; Xu J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fostering Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Styles: The Role of Driver Perception of Automated Driving Maneuvers.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jul; 66(7):1961-1976. PubMed ID: 37490722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.
    Mahdinia I; Mohammadnazar A; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106006. PubMed ID: 33556655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
    He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.