136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35667982)
1. Does size matter? Comparing robotic versus open radical nephrectomy for very large renal masses.
Pahouja G; Sweigert SE; Sweigert PJ; Gorbonos A; Patel HD; Gupta GN
Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):456.e1-456.e7. PubMed ID: 35667982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes for Radical Nephrectomy Based on Surgical Approach for Masses Greater Than 10 cm.
Grimaud LW; Chen FV; Chang J; Ziogas A; Sfakianos JP; Badani KK; Uchio EM; Anton-Culver H; Gin GE
J Endourol; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1785-1792. PubMed ID: 34148404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a large multi-institutional analysis (ROSULA Collaborative Group).
Anele UA; Marchioni M; Yang B; Simone G; Uzzo RG; Lau C; Mir MC; Capitanio U; Porter J; Jacobsohn K; de Luyk N; Mari A; Chang K; Fiori C; Sulek J; Mottrie A; White W; Perdona S; Quarto G; Bindayi A; Ashrafi A; Schips L; Berardinelli F; Zhang C; Gallucci M; Ramirez-Backhaus M; Larcher A; Kilday P; Liao M; Langenstroer P; Dasgupta P; Challacombe B; Kutikov A; Minervini A; Rha KH; Sundaram CP; Hampton LJ; Porpiglia F; Aron M; Derweesh I; Autorino R
World J Urol; 2019 Nov; 37(11):2439-2450. PubMed ID: 30734072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic Radical Nephrectomy for Massive Renal Tumors.
Abaza R; Gerhard RS; Martinez O
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Feb; 30(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 31750762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year Oncologic Outcomes After Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Andrade HS; Zargar H; Caputo PA; Akca O; Kara O; Ramirez D; Haber GP; Stein RJ; Kaouk JH
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1149-54. PubMed ID: 26719014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted Radical Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.
Crocerossa F; Carbonara U; Cantiello F; Marchioni M; Ditonno P; Mir MC; Porpiglia F; Derweesh I; Hampton LJ; Damiano R; Autorino R
Eur Urol; 2021 Oct; 80(4):428-439. PubMed ID: 33218826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival after minimally invasive vs. open radical nephrectomy for stage I and II renal cell carcinoma.
Dursun F; Elshabrawy A; Wang H; Rodriguez R; Liss MA; Kaushik D; Gelfond J; Mansour AM
Int J Clin Oncol; 2022 Jun; 27(6):1068-1076. PubMed ID: 35319076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors larger than 7 cm: a single-center experience.
Malkoc E; Ramirez D; Kara O; Maurice MJ; Nelson RJ; Caputo PA; Kaouk JH
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):781-787. PubMed ID: 27663423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Gratzke C; Seitz M; Bayrle F; Schlenker B; Bastian PJ; Haseke N; Bader M; Tilki D; Roosen A; Karl A; Reich O; Khoder WY; Wyler S; Stief CG; Staehler M; Bachmann A
BJU Int; 2009 Aug; 104(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 19239445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in the surgical management of kidney cancer by tumor stage, treatment modality, facility type, and location.
Okhawere KE; Pandav K; Grauer R; Wilson MP; Saini I; Korn TG; Meilika KN; Badani KK
J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2451-2460. PubMed ID: 37470910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. American Confederation of Urology (CAU) experience in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Secin FP; Castillo OA; Rozanec JJ; Featherston M; Holst P; Milfont JC; García Marchiñena P; Jurado Navarro A; Autrán A; Rovegno AR; Faba OR; Palou J; Teixeira Dubeux V; Nuñez Bragayrac L; Sotelo R; Zequi S; Guimarães GC; Álvarez-Maestro M; Martínez-Piñeiro L; Villoldo G; Villaronga A; Abreu Clavijo D; Decia R; Frota R; Vidal-Mora I; Finkelstein D; Monzó Gardiner JI; Schatloff O; Hernández-Porrás A; Santaella-Torres F; Quesada ET; Sánchez-Salas R; Dávila H; Mavric HV
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 27137994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparative analysis and cost considerations.
Helmers MR; Ball MW; Gorin MA; Pierorazio PM; Allaf ME
Can J Urol; 2016 Oct; 23(5):8435-8440. PubMed ID: 27705727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.
Hemal AK; Kumar A
World J Urol; 2009 Feb; 27(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 18704439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with large renal masses.
Veccia A; Dell'oglio P; Antonelli A; Minervini A; Simone G; Challacombe B; Perdonà S; Porter J; Zhang C; Capitanio U; Sundaram CP; Cacciamani G; Aron M; Anele U; Hampton LJ; Simeone C; De Naeyer G; Bradshawh A; Mari A; Campi R; Carini M; Fiori C; Gallucci M; Jacobsohn K; Eun D; Lau C; Kaouk J; Derweesh I; Porpiglia F; Mottrie A; Autorino R
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Feb; 72(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 31527571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adoption of Technology and Its Impact on Nephrectomy Outcomes, a U.S. Population-Based Analysis (2008-2012).
Golombos DM; Chughtai B; Trinh QD; Mao J; Te A; O'Malley P; Scherr DS; Del Pizzo J; Hu JC; Sedrakyan A
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 27809567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Institution Teaching Status on Perioperative Outcomes After Robotic Partial or Radical Nephrectomy.
Marchioni M; Nazzani S; Preisser F; Bandini M; Tian Z; Kapoor A; Cindolo L; Primiceri G; Carmignani L; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Shariat SF; Schips L; Karakiewicz PI
J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):621-629. PubMed ID: 29739253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of surgical and oncologic outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy: a propensity-matched cohort study.
Zhang Y; Bi H; Yan Y; Liu Z; Wang G; Song Y; Zhang S; Liu C; Ma L
Int J Clin Oncol; 2023 Jan; 28(1):145-154. PubMed ID: 36380158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical Approach Does Not Impact Margin Status After Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Masses.
Ayangbesan A; Golombos DM; Golan R; O'Malley P; Lewicki P; Wu X; Scherr DS
J Endourol; 2019 Jan; 33(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 29914269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study.
Hu JC; Treat E; Filson CP; McLaren I; Xiong S; Stepanian S; Hafez KS; Weizer AZ; Porter J
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 24857539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variation in Surgical Margin Status by Surgical Approach among Patients Undergoing Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Masses.
Tabayoyong W; Abouassaly R; Kiechle JE; Cherullo EE; Meropol NJ; Shah ND; Dong S; Thompson RH; Smaldone MC; Zhu H; Ialacci S; Kim SP
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1548-53. PubMed ID: 26094808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
