These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35668341)

  • 1. Familiarity ratings for 24,325 simplified Chinese words.
    Su Y; Li Y; Li H
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1496-1509. PubMed ID: 35668341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hong Kong Chinese character psycholinguistic norms: ratings of 4376 single Chinese characters on semantic radical transparency, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness.
    Su IF; Yum YN; Lau DK
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2989-3008. PubMed ID: 36002627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Database of Chinese-English Bilingual Speakers: Ratings of the Age of Acquisition and Familiarity.
    Wang J; Chen B
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():554785. PubMed ID: 33071876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Norms of conceptual familiarity for 3,596 French nouns and their contribution in lexical decision.
    Chedid G; Wilson MA; Bedetti C; Rey AE; Vallet GT; Brambati SM
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2238-2247. PubMed ID: 30128888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age of acquisition ratings for 19,716 simplified Chinese words.
    Xu X; Li J; Guo S
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):558-573. PubMed ID: 32748240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concreteness/abstractness ratings for two-character Chinese words in MELD-SCH.
    Xu X; Li J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0232133. PubMed ID: 32569306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Valence and arousal ratings for 11,310 simplified Chinese words.
    Xu X; Li J; Chen H
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 34100200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ; Chan YL; Sze WP; Shaoul C; Lin D
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1503-1519. PubMed ID: 27734329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
    Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chinese lexical database (CLD) : A large-scale lexical database for simplified Mandarin Chinese.
    Sun CC; Hendrix P; Ma J; Baayen RH
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2606-2629. PubMed ID: 29934697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MELD-SCH: A megastudy of lexical decision in simplified Chinese.
    Tsang YK; Huang J; Lui M; Xue M; Chan YF; Wang S; Chen HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1763-1777. PubMed ID: 28779457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-of-acquisition norms for a set of 1,749 Portuguese words.
    Cameirão ML; Vicente SG
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):474-80. PubMed ID: 20479178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A psycholinguistic database for traditional Chinese character naming.
    Chang YN; Hsu CH; Tsai JL; Chen CL; Lee CY
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 25630311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective ages of acquisition for 3300+ simplified Chinese characters.
    Cai ZG; Huang S; Xu Z; Zhao N
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):311-323. PubMed ID: 34159513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.
    Lim RY; Yap MJ; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):504-518. PubMed ID: 32019427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Chinese Lexicon Project: a repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters.
    Sze WP; Rickard Liow SJ; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):263-73. PubMed ID: 23813237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing lexical ambiguity of simplified Chinese characters: Plurality and relatedness of character meanings.
    Chen H; Xu X; Wang T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Apr; 77(4):677-693. PubMed ID: 37198743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CCLOWW: A grade-level Chinese children's lexicon of written words.
    Li L; Yang Y; Song M; Fang S; Zhang M; Chen Q; Cai Q
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):1874-1889. PubMed ID: 35776384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Valence, arousal, familiarity, concreteness, and imageability ratings for 292 two-character Chinese nouns in Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong.
    Yee LT
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174569. PubMed ID: 28346514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition performance among Mandarin-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.
    Wang NM; Wu CM; Kirk KI
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 74(8):883-90. PubMed ID: 20846499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.