218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35668453)
1. The Amsterdam Foot Model: a clinically informed multi-segment foot model developed to minimize measurement errors in foot kinematics.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Piening M; Streekstra GJ; Maas M; van der Krogt MM; Harlaar J
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 35668453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of soft tissue artifacts on multi-segment foot kinematics.
Schallig W; Streekstra GJ; Hulshof CM; Kleipool RP; Dobbe JGG; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM; van den Noort JC
J Biomech; 2021 May; 120():110359. PubMed ID: 33730563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marker placement sensitivity of the Oxford and Rizzoli foot models in adults and children.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2021 Sep; 126():110629. PubMed ID: 34320419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the kinematic output of the Oxford and Rizzoli Foot Models during normal gait and voluntary pathological gait in healthy adults.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; McCahill J; Stebbins J; Leardini A; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():126-132. PubMed ID: 32920448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin marker-based versus bone morphology-based coordinate systems of the hindfoot and forefoot.
Hulshof CM; Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Streekstra GJ; Kleipool RP; Gg Dobbe J; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112001. PubMed ID: 38527409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability testing of the heel marker in three-dimensional gait analysis.
McCahill J; Schallig W; Stebbins J; Prescott R; Theologis T; Harlaar J
Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():84-87. PubMed ID: 33517041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between the Rizzoli and Oxford foot models with independent and clustered tracking markers.
Teixeira BG; Araújo VL; Santos TRT; Magalhães FA; Resende RA; Schallig W; van der Krogt MM; Fonseca ST; Souza TR
Gait Posture; 2022 Jan; 91():48-51. PubMed ID: 34649170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the kinematics, repeatability, and reproducibility of five different multi-segment foot models.
Yoo HJ; Park HS; Lee DO; Kim SH; Park GY; Cho TJ; Lee DY
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 34991669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of multi-segmental kinematic modelling in the paediatric foot using three concurrent foot models.
Mahaffey R; Morrison SC; Drechsler WI; Cramp MC
J Foot Ankle Res; 2013 Oct; 6(1):43. PubMed ID: 24176241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-segment foot kinematics during gait in children with spastic cerebral palsy.
Schallig W; Piening M; Quirijnen L; Witbreuk MM; Buizer AI; van der Krogt MM
Gait Posture; 2024 May; 110():144-149. PubMed ID: 38608379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One- and multi-segment foot models lead to opposite results on ankle joint kinematics during gait: Implications for clinical assessment.
Pothrat C; Authier G; Viehweger E; Berton E; Rao G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Jun; 30(5):493-9. PubMed ID: 25812728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model: Comparison of a team of assessors with different backgrounds and no prior experience of the Oxford Foot Model.
Reay J; Leboeuf F; Hanssen B; Chiu J; Jones R
Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():191-198. PubMed ID: 34864484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model in children with foot deformity.
McCahill J; Stebbins J; Koning B; Harlaar J; Theologis T
Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():86-89. PubMed ID: 29310014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of knee marker misplacement on gait kinematics of children with cerebral palsy using the Conventional Gait Model-A sensitivity study.
Fonseca M; Gasparutto X; Leboeuf F; Dumas R; Armand S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232064. PubMed ID: 32330162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach.
Dixon PC; Böhm H; Döderlein L
J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(6):1011-6. PubMed ID: 22304842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults.
Wright CJ; Arnold BL; Coffey TG; Pidcoe PE
Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinematic analysis of a multi-segment foot model for research and clinical applications: a repeatability analysis.
Carson MC; Harrington ME; Thompson N; O'Connor JJ; Theologis TN
J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1299-307. PubMed ID: 11522309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The modified Shriners Hospitals for Children Greenville (mSHCG) multi-segment foot model provides clinically acceptable measurements of ankle and midfoot angles: A dual fluoroscopy study.
Roach KE; Foreman KB; MacWilliams BA; Karpos K; Nichols J; Anderson AE
Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():258-265. PubMed ID: 33626450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The between-day repeatability, standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change for discrete kinematic parameters during treadmill running.
Bramah C; Preece SJ; Gill N; Herrington L
Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():211-216. PubMed ID: 33610824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model. Part I: Model repeatability and kinematic validity.
Bruening DA; Cooney KM; Buczek FL
Gait Posture; 2012 Apr; 35(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 22421190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
