These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35669170)

  • 21. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in dyslexia: An examination of cognitive factors underlying eye movement differences and comprehension failures.
    Stella M; Engelhardt PE
    Dyslexia; 2019 May; 25(2):115-141. PubMed ID: 30990960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of LIFG-based executive control in sentence comprehension.
    Vuong LC; Martin RC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2015; 32(5):243-65. PubMed ID: 26216232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neural Measures Reveal Implicit Learning during Language Processing.
    Batterink LJ; Cheng LY; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1636-49. PubMed ID: 27243616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of cognitive control on the processing of L2 garden path sentence among Chinese-English bilinguals.
    Xie Z; Zeng G; Zhou S; Wang J
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2022; 16():976155. PubMed ID: 36212192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retrieval cues and syntactic ambiguity resolution: Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence.
    Martin AE; McElree B
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 33(6):769-783. PubMed ID: 31131287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The on-line resolution of the sentence complement/relative clause ambiguity: evidence from Spanish.
    Demestre J; García-Albea JE
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 14959507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Structure before meaning: sentence processing, plausibility, and subcategorization.
    Kizach J; Nyvad AM; Christensen KR
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e76326. PubMed ID: 24116101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Syntactic priming in German-English bilinguals during sentence comprehension.
    Weber K; Indefrey P
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(4):1164-72. PubMed ID: 19328233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Studying the grammatical aspects of word recognition: lexical priming, parsing, and syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Novick JM; Kim A; Trueswell JC
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2003 Jan; 32(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 12647563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Deaf readers' response to syntactic complexity: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ; Corina DP; Morford JP; Hafer S; Hoversten LJ;
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 23868696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.
    Long DL; Prat CS
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):375-91. PubMed ID: 18426067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.
    Fine AB; Jaeger TF; Farmer TA; Qian T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77661. PubMed ID: 24204909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. First Event-Related Potentials Evidence of Auditory Morphosyntactic Processing in a Subject-Object-Verb Nominative-Accusative Language (Farsi).
    Meykadeh A; Golfam A; Nasrabadi AM; Ameri H; Sommer W
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():698165. PubMed ID: 34975607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological Correlates of Second-Language Syntactic Processes Are Related to Native and Second Language Distance Regardless of Age of Acquisition.
    Díaz B; Erdocia K; de Menezes RF; Mueller JL; Sebastián-Gallés N; Laka I
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():133. PubMed ID: 26903930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Referential context and executive functioning influence children's resolution of syntactic ambiguity.
    Qi Z; Love J; Fisher C; Brown-Schmidt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1922-1947. PubMed ID: 32584080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities.
    Speer SR; Kjelgaard MM; Dobroth KM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1996 Mar; 25(2):249-71. PubMed ID: 8667298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Semantic and Syntactic Interference in Sentence Comprehension: A Comparison of Working Memory Models.
    Tan Y; Martin RC; Van Dyke JA
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():198. PubMed ID: 28261133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.