BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35670000)

  • 1. Score-based measurement invariance checks for Bayesian maximum-a-posteriori estimates in item response theory.
    Debelak R; Pawel S; Strobl C; Merkle EC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):728-752. PubMed ID: 35670000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robustness of the performance of the optimized hierarchical two-parameter logistic IRT model for small-sample item calibration.
    König C; Spoden C; Frey A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3965-3983. PubMed ID: 36333627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
    Wang T; Strobl C; Zeileis A; Merkle EC
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):132-155. PubMed ID: 29150815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing Differential Item Functioning in Small Samples.
    Belzak WCM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(5):722-747. PubMed ID: 31583903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient Standard Error Formulas of Ability Estimators with Dichotomous Item Response Models.
    Magis D
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 25691364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On Latent Trait Estimation in Multidimensional Compensatory Item Response Models.
    Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):428-49. PubMed ID: 24604245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power Analysis for the Wald, LR, Score, and Gradient Tests in a Marginal Maximum Likelihood Framework: Applications in IRT.
    Zimmer F; Draxler C; Debelak R
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1249-1298. PubMed ID: 36029390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HBMIRT: A SAS macro for estimating uni- and multidimensional 1- and 2-parameter item response models in small (and large!) samples.
    Wagner W; Zitzmann S; Hecht M
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):4130-4161. PubMed ID: 38519726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An R toolbox for score-based measurement invariance tests in IRT models.
    Schneider L; Strobl C; Zeileis A; Debelak R
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2101-2113. PubMed ID: 34918222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Second-Order Probability Matching Priors for the Person Parameter in Unidimensional IRT Models.
    Liu Y; Hannig J; Pal Majumder A
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):701-718. PubMed ID: 31264028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian tests of measurement invariance.
    Verhagen AJ; Fox JP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):383-401. PubMed ID: 23039871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian Estimation for Item Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Categorical Indicators.
    Bainter SA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(5):593-615. PubMed ID: 28715231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rasch Model Parameter Estimation in the Presence of a Nonnormal Latent Trait Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Approach.
    Finch H; Edwards JM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):662-684. PubMed ID: 29795882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
    Chen Y; Li X; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):124-146. PubMed ID: 30456747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Doubly Latent Space Joint Model for Local Item and Person Dependence in the Analysis of Item Response Data.
    Jin IH; Jeon M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):236-260. PubMed ID: 29987708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adapting cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing item selection rules to traditional item response theory.
    Sorrel MA; Barrada JR; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227196. PubMed ID: 31923227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scale length does matter: Recommendations for measurement invariance testing with categorical factor analysis and item response theory approaches.
    D'Urso ED; De Roover K; Vermunt JK; Tijmstra J
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2114-2145. PubMed ID: 34910286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation for item response theory models.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):573-588. PubMed ID: 30350024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An extension of a bayesian approach to detect differential item functioning.
    Sinharay S
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 23816593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study.
    Holtmann J; Koch T; Lochner K; Eid M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):661-680. PubMed ID: 27594086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.