These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35670000)

  • 21. Model-Based Measures for Detecting and Quantifying Response Bias.
    Chalmers RP
    Psychometrika; 2018 Sep; 83(3):696-732. PubMed ID: 29907891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Asymptotic Posterior Normality of Multivariate Latent Traits in an IRT Model.
    Kornely MJK; Kateri M
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):1146-1172. PubMed ID: 35149979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scoring Depression on a Common Metric: A Comparison of EAP Estimation, Plausible Value Imputation, and Full Bayesian IRT Modeling.
    Fischer HF; Rose M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 30235003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of Differential Item Functioning in Alcohol Use Disorder: Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Criteria Discrimination Estimates.
    Vize CE; Lane SP
    Assessment; 2022 Jul; 29(5):925-939. PubMed ID: 33615848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testing gender invariance of the hospital anxiety and depression scale using the classical approach and Bayesian approach.
    Fong TC; Ho RT
    Qual Life Res; 2014 Jun; 23(5):1421-6. PubMed ID: 24307211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating Optimal Weights for Compound Scores: A Multidimensional IRT Approach.
    van Lier HG; Siemons L; van der Laar MAFJ; Glas CAW
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(6):914-924. PubMed ID: 30463444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluations of the sum-score-based and item response theory-based tests of group mean differences under various simulation conditions.
    Wang M; Reeve BB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2604-2618. PubMed ID: 34617840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An Investigation of Age-Related Differential Item Functioning in the EQ-5D-5L Using Item Response Theory and Logistic Regression.
    Penton H; Dayson C; Hulme C; Young T
    Value Health; 2022 Sep; 25(9):1566-1574. PubMed ID: 35487819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Testing item response theory invariance of the standardized Quality-of-life Disease Impact Scale (QDIS(®)) in acute coronary syndrome patients: differential functioning of items and test.
    Deng N; Anatchkova MD; Waring ME; Han KT; Ware JE
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Aug; 24(8):1809-22. PubMed ID: 25601166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing item fit for unidimensional item response theory models using residuals from estimated item response functions.
    Haberman SJ; Sinharay S; Chon KH
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):417-40. PubMed ID: 25106393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory Models.
    Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):846-869. PubMed ID: 30793230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Restricted Recalibration of Item Response Theory Models.
    Liu Y; Yang JS; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):529-553. PubMed ID: 30895437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayes Factor Covariance Testing in Item Response Models.
    Fox JP; Mulder J; Sinharay S
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):979-1006. PubMed ID: 28852944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The UMP Exact Test and the Confidence Interval for Person Parameters in IRT Models.
    Liu X; Han Z; Johnson MS
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):182-202. PubMed ID: 28836133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gibbs Samplers for Logistic Item Response Models via the Pólya-Gamma Distribution: A Computationally Efficient Data-Augmentation Strategy.
    Jiang Z; Templin J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):358-374. PubMed ID: 30382548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.
    Teresi JA; Kleinman M; Ocepek-Welikson K
    Stat Med; 2000 Jun 15-30; 19(11-12):1651-83. PubMed ID: 10844726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Compromised item detection: A Bayesian change-point perspective.
    Du Y; Zhang S; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):131-153. PubMed ID: 36069306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Bayesian Approach to More Stable Estimates of Group-Level Effects in Contextual Studies.
    Zitzmann S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):688-705. PubMed ID: 26717127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing five depression measures in depressed Chinese patients using item response theory: an examination of item properties, measurement precision and score comparability.
    Zhao Y; Chan W; Lo BC
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):60. PubMed ID: 28372559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Regularized Bayesian calibration and scoring of the WD-FAB IRT model improves predictive performance over marginal maximum likelihood.
    Chang JC; Porcino J; Rasch EK; Tang L
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266350. PubMed ID: 35395055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.