These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35670283)
1. Disinfection methods of dental unit waterlines contamination: a systematic review. Wu M; Shi Z; Yu X; Xu Y; Jin X; Zhang L; Fu B J Med Microbiol; 2022 Jun; 71(6):. PubMed ID: 35670283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Formation and decontamination of biofilms in dental unit waterlines. Wirthlin MR; Marshall GW; Rowland RW J Periodontol; 2003 Nov; 74(11):1595-609. PubMed ID: 14682656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monitoring the decontamination efficacy of the novel Poseidon-S disinfectant system in dental unit water lines. Fujita M; Mashima I; Nakazawa F J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2017 Jun; 50(3):270-276. PubMed ID: 26066542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental unit waterlines: biofilms, disinfection and recurrence. Meiller TF; Depaola LG; Kelley JI; Baqui AA; Turng BF; Falkler WA J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jan; 130(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 9919033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study on the disinfection effect of chlorine dioxide disinfectant (ClO Yue C; Yuya H; Zhihuan L; Zimo W; Jianying F BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):648. PubMed ID: 38824549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants. Tuttlebee CM; O'Donnell MJ; Keane CT; Russell RJ; Sullivan DJ; Falkiner F; Coleman DC J Hosp Infect; 2002 Nov; 52(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 12419272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of acoustic waves in preventing Streptococcus mutans adhesion on dental unit water line. Pantanella F; Schippa S; Solimini A; Rosa L; Bettucci A; Berlutti F Ann Ig; 2019; 31(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30714608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dental Unit Waterlines in Quito and Caracas Contaminated with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria: A Potential Health Risk in Dental Practice. Castellano Realpe OJ; Gutiérrez JC; Sierra DA; Pazmiño Martínez LA; Prado Palacios YY; Echeverría G; de Waard JH Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32244267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anti biofilm effect of low concentration chlorine containing disinfectant assisted by multi enzyme detergent in dental unit waterlines. Zhu C; Hong FH; Yu X New Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 44(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 33978196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dental unit waterline contamination: a review of research and findings from a clinic setting. Wirthlin MR; Roth M Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Mar; 36(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 25822748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel automated waterline cleaning system that facilitates effective and consistent control of microbial biofilm contamination of dental chair unit waterlines: a one-year study. O'Donnell MJ; Shore AC; Coleman DC J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):648-61. PubMed ID: 16442201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Establishing a laboratory model of dental unit waterlines bacterial biofilms using a CDC biofilm reactor. Yoon HY; Lee SY Biofouling; 2017 Nov; 33(10):917-926. PubMed ID: 29160100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effect of Using Hydrogen Peroxide for Periodic Disinfection Combined With Continuous Disinfection to Control Contamination in Dental Unit Waterline]. Chang J; Dang Y; Wang C; Li X Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Jan; 55(1):217-223. PubMed ID: 38322511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a hydrogen peroxide disinfectant for dental unit waterlines. Linger JB; Molinari JA; Forbes WC; Farthing CF; Winget WJ J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Sep; 132(9):1287-91. PubMed ID: 11665356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents. Kettering JD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Stephens JA; Naylor WP; Zhang W J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 30(10):735-41. PubMed ID: 12403476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between Two Types of Dental Unit Waterlines: How Evaluation of Microbiological Contamination Can Support Risk Containment. Lizzadro J; Mazzotta M; Girolamini L; Dormi A; Pellati T; Cristino S Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30682855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolation of an unusual fungus in treated dental unit waterlines. Porteous NB; Redding SW; Thompson EH; Grooters AM; De Hoog S; Sutton DA J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Jul; 134(7):853-8. PubMed ID: 12892442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Waterline biofilm and the dental treatment facility: a review. Pederson ED; Stone ME; Ragain JC; Simecek JW Gen Dent; 2002; 50(2):190-5; quiz 196-7. PubMed ID: 12004714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of cleaning regimes on dental water unit contamination. Abdallah SA; Khalil AI J Water Health; 2011 Dec; 9(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 22048424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of a Water Disinfection Method Based on Osmosis and Chlorine Dioxide for the Prevention of Microbial Contamination in Dental Practices. Totaro M; Badalucco F; Papini F; Grassi N; Mannocci M; Baggiani M; Tuvo B; Casini B; Menchini Fabris GB; Baggiani A Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]