These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers. Grulkowski I; Liu JJ; Zhang JY; Potsaid B; Jayaraman V; Cable AE; Duker JS; Fujimoto JG Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. OCT Biometry (B-OCT): A New Method for Measuring Ocular Axial Dimensions. Sikorski BL; Suchon P J Ophthalmol; 2019; 2019():9192456. PubMed ID: 31511790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new fully automatic measurement optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and agreement with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer. Yu J; Zhao G; Lei CS; Wan T; Ning R; Xing W; Ma X; Pan H; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Huang J Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 37142332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer. Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices. Oh R; Oh JY; Choi HJ; Kim MK; Yoon CH BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33504333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry. Huang J; Chen H; Li Y; Chen Z; Gao R; Yu J; Zhao Y; Lu W; McAlinden C; Wang Q J Refract Surg; 2019 Feb; 35(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 30742226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster. Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer. Tañá-Rivero P; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Tello-Elordi C; Pastor-Pascual F; Montés-Micó R J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Apr; 47(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 33252569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement between a Spectral-Domain Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer with a Swept-Source Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry Biometer in Eyes with Cataract. Zarei-Ghanavati S; Nikpayam M; Namdari M; Bakhtiari E; Hassanzadeh S; Ziaei M J Curr Ophthalmol; 2023; 35(2):153-158. PubMed ID: 38250485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers. Cheng SM; Zhang JS; Shao X; Wu ZT; Li TT; Wang P; Lin JH; Yu AY Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Jul; 260(7):2271-2281. PubMed ID: 35171331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of 2 swept-source OCT biometers and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Fişuş AD; Hirnschall ND; Ruiss M; Pilwachs C; Georgiev S; Findl O J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 33770018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes. Hua Y; Qiu W; Xiao Q; Wu Q PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193023. PubMed ID: 29486009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems. Calvo-Sanz JA; Portero-Benito A; Arias-Puente A Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 256(3):559-566. PubMed ID: 29392397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of an upgraded optical biometer with 2 validated optical biometers. Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Jul; 47(7):859-864. PubMed ID: 33577278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement between a new fully automatic ocular biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry and an optical biometer based on Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry. Ning R; Xu H; Li Z; Yu J; Xu S; Lei CS; Wang Y; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Huang J BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Oct; 24(1):455. PubMed ID: 39420260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability of new optical biometer and agreement with 2 validated optical biometers, all based on SS-OCT. Galzignato A; Lupardi E; Hoffer KJ; Barboni P; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Jan; 49(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 36026703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The repeatability and agreement of biometric measurements by dual Scheimpflug device with integrated optical biometer. Hashemi H; Sardari S; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7748. PubMed ID: 35546610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]