These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35671083)

  • 1. Temporal and Directional Cue Effects on the Cocktail Party Problem for Patients With Listening Difficulties Without Clinical Hearing Loss.
    Kawase T; Teraoka R; Obuchi C; Sakamoto S
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1740-1751. PubMed ID: 35671083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.
    Rennies J; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519854597. PubMed ID: 31172880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Litovsky RY; Parkinson A; Arcaroli J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 19455039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short Implicit Voice Training Affects Listening Effort During a Voice Cue Sensitivity Task With Vocoder-Degraded Speech.
    Biçer A; Koelewijn T; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):900-916. PubMed ID: 36695603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Listening Difficulties in Children With Normal Audiograms: Relation to Hearing and Cognition.
    Petley L; Hunter LL; Motlagh Zadeh L; Stewart HJ; Sloat NT; Perdew A; Lin L; Moore DR
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1640-1655. PubMed ID: 34261857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a Listening Training Paradigm: Evaluation in Normal-Hearing Young and Middle-Aged Adults.
    Van Wilderode M; Van Humbeeck N; Krampe RT; van Wieringen A
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 37076940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations.
    Picou EM; Lewis D; Angley G; Tharpe AM
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):790-803. PubMed ID: 31584502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Tinnitus and Duration of Deafness on Sound Localization and Speech Recognition in Noise in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Liu YW; Cheng X; Chen B; Peng K; Ishiyama A; Fu QJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518813802. PubMed ID: 30509148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech Intelligibility as a Cue for Acceptable Noise Levels.
    Recker KL; Micheyl C
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):465-474. PubMed ID: 28169839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment.
    Kirk KI; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1395-405. PubMed ID: 9430759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cueing listeners to attend to a target talker progressively improves word report as the duration of the cue-target interval lengthens to 2,000 ms.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1520-1538. PubMed ID: 29696570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty.
    Eckert MA; Teubner-Rhodes S; Vaden KI; Ahlstrom JB; McClaskey CM; Dubno JR
    Brain Struct Funct; 2022 Jan; 227(1):203-218. PubMed ID: 34632538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.