These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35671083)

  • 21. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Hearing Aid Directionality and Remote Microphone on Speech Intelligibility in Complex Listening Situations.
    Wagener KC; Vormann M; Latzel M; Mülder HE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804945. PubMed ID: 30322342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Binaural analysis in the aging auditory system.
    Warren LR; Wagener JW; Herman GE
    J Gerontol; 1978 Sep; 33(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 299563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Time course and cost of misdirecting auditory spatial attention in younger and older adults.
    Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):711-21. PubMed ID: 24165300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions.
    Mackenzie E; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory motion as a cue for source segregation and selection in a "cocktail party" listening environment.
    Cho AY; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1684. PubMed ID: 36182296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An Effect of Gaze Direction in Cocktail Party Listening.
    Best V; Boyd AD; Sen K
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231152356. PubMed ID: 36691678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences.
    Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder.
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 May; 19(5):377-91. PubMed ID: 19253811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mitigation of informational masking in individuals with single-sided deafness by integrated bone conduction hearing aids.
    May BJ; Bowditch S; Liu Y; Eisen M; Niparko JK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24067501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Aging effects on detection of spectral changes induced by a break in sound correlation.
    Qu T; Cao S; Chen X; Huang Y; Li L; Wu X; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 23132528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.
    Lee JH; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1700-17. PubMed ID: 22978898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Static and dynamic cocktail party listening in younger and older adults.
    Meister H; Wenzel F; Gehlen AK; Kessler J; Walger M
    Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():108020. PubMed ID: 32698114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does increasing the intelligibility of a competing sound source interfere more with speech comprehension in older adults than it does in younger adults?
    Lu Z; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2655-2677. PubMed ID: 27566326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.