These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35671083)

  • 41. Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise.
    Krueger M; Schulte M; Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Meis M; Brand T; Holube I
    Am J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 26(3S):378-392. PubMed ID: 29049622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. What Can We Learn about Auditory Processing from Adult Hearing Questionnaires?
    Bamiou DE; Iliadou VV; Zanchetta S; Spyridakou C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):824-37. PubMed ID: 26554488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A "Buildup" of Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.
    Best V; Swaminathan J; Kopčo N; Roverud E; Shinn-Cunningham B
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807519. PubMed ID: 30353783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of Spectral Contrast Enhancement on Speech-on-Speech Intelligibility and Voice Cue Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Users.
    El Boghdady N; Langner F; Gaudrain E; Başkent D; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):271-289. PubMed ID: 32925307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Peripheral hearing loss reduces the ability of children to direct selective attention during multi-talker listening.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():160-172. PubMed ID: 28505526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On the Interaction of Head and Gaze Control With Acoustic Beam Width of a Simulated Beamformer in a Two-Talker Scenario.
    Hládek Ĺ; Porr B; Naylor G; Lunner T; Owen Brimijoin W
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519876795. PubMed ID: 31547776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Revealing Perceptional and Cognitive Mechanisms in Static and Dynamic Cocktail Party Listening by Means of Error Analyses.
    Wächtler M; Kessler J; Walger M; Meister H
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221111676. PubMed ID: 35849353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Emotionally conditioning the target-speech voice enhances recognition of the target speech under "cocktail-party" listening conditions.
    Lu L; Bao X; Chen J; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):871-883. PubMed ID: 29473143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Auditory Localization and Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Suspected Auditory Processing Disorder.
    Boothalingam S; Purcell DW; Allan C; Allen P; Macpherson E
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1187-1196. PubMed ID: 30870241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bottom-up and top-down neural signatures of disordered multi-talker speech perception in adults with normal hearing.
    Parthasarathy A; Hancock KE; Bennett K; DeGruttola V; Polley DB
    Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31961322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Speech-in-Speech Recognition and Spatially Selective Attention in Children and Adults.
    Kane SG; Dean KM; Buss E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 64(9):3617-3626. PubMed ID: 34403280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention.
    Koelewijn T; de Kluiver H; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():81-90. PubMed ID: 25732724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [A sound reproduction system using wave field synthesis to simulate everyday listening conditions].
    Weißgerber T
    HNO; 2019 Apr; 67(4):265-271. PubMed ID: 30859252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.