These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35672886)

  • 1. AzBio Sentence test in Hebrew (HeBio): development, preliminary validation, and the effect of noise.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Dahan T; Katzenel U; Dorman MF; Litvak LM; Fostick L
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Sep; 23(5):270-279. PubMed ID: 35672886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Age, Type of Noise, and Cochlear Implants on Adaptive Sentence-in-Noise Task.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Fostick L
    J Clin Med; 2022 Oct; 11(19):. PubMed ID: 36233739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF; Litvak LM; Cook SJ; Loiselle LM; DeJong MD; Hedley-Williams A; Sunderhaus LS; Hayes CA; Gifford RH
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 24658601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF; Litvak LM; Van Wie S; Gifford RH; Loizou PC; Loiselle LM; Oakes T; Cook S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 21829134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
    Jansen S; Koning R; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition.
    Faulkner KF; Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):582-94. PubMed ID: 26134725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and Validation of the Spanish AzBio Sentence Corpus.
    Rivas A; Perkins E; Rivas A; Rincon LA; Litvak L; Spahr T; Dorman M; Kessler D; Gifford R
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jan; 42(1):154-158. PubMed ID: 33885261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the American English Matrix Test with Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Potts LG; Olivo AM; Reeder RM; Firszt JB
    Int J Audiol; 2024 May; 63(5):342-348. PubMed ID: 36896781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Speech-in-Noise Performance in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Berger JI; Gander PE; Kim S; Schwalje AT; Woo J; Na YM; Holmes A; Hong JM; Dunn CC; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; McMurray B; Griffiths TD; Choi I
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1107-1120. PubMed ID: 37144890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
    Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of Direct-Connect for Remote Speech-Perception Testing in Cochlear Implants.
    Sevier JD; Choi S; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1162-1173. PubMed ID: 30640730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Older Individuals Meeting Medicare Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria in Noise but Not in Quiet: Are These Patients Improved by Surgery?
    Mudery JA; Francis R; McCrary H; Jacob A
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):187-191. PubMed ID: 27832005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AzBio Speech Understanding Performance in Quiet and Noise in High Performing Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brant JA; Eliades SJ; Kaufman H; Chen J; Ruckenstein MJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 29557842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Voice Discrimination in Quiet and in Background Noise by Simulated and Real Cochlear Implant Users.
    Levin M; Zaltz Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Dec; 66(12):5169-5186. PubMed ID: 37992412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    O'Neill ER; Parke MN; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1224. PubMed ID: 33639827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
    Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):958-968. PubMed ID: 29474218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.