These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3567305)
1. Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design. Connor RJ Biometrics; 1987 Mar; 43(1):207-11. PubMed ID: 3567305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On approximate sample sizes for comparing two independent proportions with the use of Yates' correction. Ury HK; Fleiss JL Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 7407322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Paired versus two-sample design for a clinical trial of treatments with dichotomous outcome: power considerations. Wacholder S; Weinberg CR Biometrics; 1982 Sep; 38(3):801-12. PubMed ID: 7171700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unraveling the mystique of power analysis. Rudy EB; Kerr M Heart Lung; 1991 Sep; 20(5 Pt 1):517-22. PubMed ID: 1894533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Power and sample size evaluation for the McNemar test with application to matched case-control studies. Lachin JM Stat Med; 1992 Jun; 11(9):1239-51. PubMed ID: 1509223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quick and simple approximation of sample sizes for comparing two independent binomial distributions: different-sample-size case. Lee YJ Biometrics; 1984 Mar; 40(1):239-41. PubMed ID: 6733231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review. Sahai H; Khurshid A Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of procedures for testing the equality of survival distributions. Joe H; Koziol JA; Petkau AJ Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):327-40. PubMed ID: 7272418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An introduction to sample size and power. Bernstein BA J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2008 Dec; 29(6):516-22. PubMed ID: 19077847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Exact unconditional tests for testing non-inferiority in matched-pairs design. Sidik K Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 12520561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for detecting linear trend in proportions. Nam JM Biometrics; 1987 Sep; 43(3):701-5. PubMed ID: 3663825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modification of the computational procedure in Parker and Bregman's method of calculating sample size from matched case-control studies with a dichotomous exposure. Novikov I; Oberman B; Freedman L Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1123-6; discussion 1126-7. PubMed ID: 16401288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conditional power calculations for clinical trials with historical controls. Korn EL; Freidlin B Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2922-31. PubMed ID: 16479548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficiency of case-control studies with multiple controls per case: continuous or dichotomous data. Ury HK Biometrics; 1975 Sep; 31(3):643-9. PubMed ID: 1100136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Redressing the power and effect of significance. A new approach to an old problem: teaching statistics to nursing students. Taylor S; Muncer S Nurse Educ Today; 2000 Jul; 20(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 10895117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample size determination for comparing several survival curves with unequal allocations. Halabi S; Singh B Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1793-815. PubMed ID: 15160409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]