154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35673123)
1. Characteristics of Electronic Informed Consent Platforms for Consenting Patients to Research Studies: A Scoping Review.
Guarino J; Parvanova I; Finkelstein J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jun; 290():777-781. PubMed ID: 35673123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digitalizing the Clinical Research Informed Consent Process: Assessing the Participant Experience in Comparison With Traditional Paper-Based Methods.
Buckley MT; O'Shea MR; Kundu S; Lipitz-Snyderman A; Kuperman G; Shah S; Iasonos A; Houston C; Terzulli SL; Lengfellner JM; Sabbatini P
JCO Oncol Pract; 2023 Mar; 19(3):e355-e364. PubMed ID: 36534933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing and Practical Implementation of a User-Friendly Personalized and Long-Term Electronic Informed Consent Prototype in Clinical Research: Mixed Methods Study.
De Sutter E; Geerts D; Yskout K; Verreydt S; Borry P; Barbier L; Huys I
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e46306. PubMed ID: 38113088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation.
De Sutter E; Verreydt S; Yskout K; Geerts D; Borry P; Outtier A; Ferrante M; Vandermeulen C; Vanmechelen N; Van der Schueren B; Huys I
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Nov; 22(1):296. PubMed ID: 36397108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Personalized and long-term electronic informed consent in clinical research: stakeholder views.
De Sutter E; Borry P; Geerts D; Huys I
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):108. PubMed ID: 34332572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspectives on Electronic Informed Consent From Patients Underrepresented in Research in the United States: A Focus Group Study.
Simon CM; Schartz HA; Rosenthal GE; Eisenstein EL; Klein DW
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):338-348. PubMed ID: 29790410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review.
Yusof MYPM; Teo CH; Ng CJ
BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):117. PubMed ID: 36414962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.
Cohen E; Byrom B; Becher A; Jörntén-Karlsson M; Mackenzie AK
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e43883. PubMed ID: 37656499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking informed consent in the time of COVID-19: An exploratory survey.
De Sutter E; Lalova-Spinks T; Borry P; Valcke P; Kindt E; Negrouk A; Verhenneman G; Derèze JJ; Storme R; Huys I
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():995688. PubMed ID: 36237540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of an Educational and Interactive Informed Consent Process on Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
Lee YS; Cho DC; Sung JK; Han I; Kim CH; Kim JY; Kim KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Feb; 45(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 31513103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Participant comprehension and acceptability of enhanced versus text-only electronic informed consent: an innovative qualitative pilot study.
Corneli A; Starling S; Choi Y; Vosylius J; Madre L; Mackinnon A; Tenaerts P
Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2024 Jan; 10(1):10. PubMed ID: 38233932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electronic Informed Consent in Mobile Applications Research.
Wilbanks JT
J Law Med Ethics; 2020 Mar; 48(1_suppl):147-153. PubMed ID: 32342737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informing a European guidance framework on electronic informed consent in clinical research: a qualitative study.
De Sutter E; Borry P; Huys I; Barbier L
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Feb; 23(1):181. PubMed ID: 36810088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting.
Skelton E; Drey N; Rutherford M; Ayers S; Malamateniou C
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Nov; 143():104271. PubMed ID: 32979650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structural under-reporting of informed consent, data handling and sharing, ethical approval, and application of Open Science principles as proxies for study quality conduct in COVID-19 research: a systematic scoping review.
Wilmes N; Hendriks CWE; Viets CTA; Cornelissen SJWM; van Mook WNKA; Cox-Brinkman J; Celi LA; Martinez-Martin N; Gichoya JW; Watkins C; Bakhshi-Raiez F; Wynants L; van der Horst ICC; van Bussel BCT
BMJ Glob Health; 2023 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 37257937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usability Inspection of Multipurpose Scalable Informed Consent Platform.
Finkelstein J; Robins D; Liu J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Jul; 262():198-201. PubMed ID: 31349301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review.
De Sutter E; Zaçe D; Boccia S; Di Pietro ML; Geerts D; Borry P; Huys I
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e19129. PubMed ID: 33030440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era.
De Sutter E; Coopmans B; Vanendert F; Dooms M; Allegaert K; Borry P; Huys I
Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():724431. PubMed ID: 34540773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing and Implementing Electronic Consent Procedures in Response to Covid-19 Restrictions.
Bromberg JR; Nimaja E; Kiragu AW; Lawson KA; Lee L; Nasr IW; Pruitt C; Ruest SM; Mello MJ
Ethics Hum Res; 2022 Jul; 44(4):39-44. PubMed ID: 35802791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
