862 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35674412)
1. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
Li N; Boonen A; van den Bergh JP; van Kuijk SMJ; Wyers CE; van Oostwaard M; Vranken L; Bours SPG; Hiligsmann M
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):829-839. PubMed ID: 35674412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Head-to-Head Comparison of UK SF-6D and Thai and UK EQ-5D-5L Value Sets in Thai Patients with Chronic Diseases.
Sakthong P; Munpan W
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Oct; 15(5):669-679. PubMed ID: 28290106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of measurement properties between UK SF-6D and English EQ-5D-5L and Thai EQ-5D-5L value sets in general Thai population.
Kangwanrattanakul K
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Aug; 21(4):765-774. PubMed ID: 32981380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D, and comparison of their psychometric properties in a spinal postoperative Spanish population.
Selva-Sevilla C; Ferrara P; Gerónimo-Pardo M
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):649-662. PubMed ID: 32065301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5 L and SF-6D in Chinese patients with low back pain.
Ye Z; Sun L; Wang Q
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Apr; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 30971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D among patients with haemophilia.
Xu RH; Dong D; Luo N; Wong EL; Wu Y; Yu S; Yang R; Liu J; Yuan H; Zhang S
Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Jun; 22(4):547-557. PubMed ID: 33761029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with health complaints attributed to their amalgam fillings: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing amalgam removal.
Lamu AN; Björkman L; Hamre HJ; Alræk T; Musial F; Robberstad B
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Apr; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 33865400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation and comparison of EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) among stable angina patients.
Wu J; Han Y; Zhao FL; Zhou J; Chen Z; Sun H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Oct; 12():156. PubMed ID: 25343944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the measurement properties of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese population health survey.
Xie S; Wang D; Wu J; Liu C; Jiang W
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Jun; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 35710429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health-related quality of life of patients with a recent fracture attending a fracture liaison service: a 3-year follow-up study.
Li N; van Oostwaard M; van den Bergh JP; Hiligsmann M; Boonen A; van Kuijk SMJ; Vranken L; Bours SPG; Wyers CE
Osteoporos Int; 2022 Mar; 33(3):577-588. PubMed ID: 34671823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of EQ-5D-5L, VAS, and SF-6D in Thai Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.
Thaweethamcharoen T; Noparatayaporn P; Sritippayawan S; Aiyasanon N
Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 May; 18():59-64. PubMed ID: 30502661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health utility measurement for people living with HIV/AIDS under combined antiretroviral therapy: A comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D.
Wang X; Luo H; Yao E; Tang R; Dong W; Liu F; Liang J; Xiao M; Zhang Z; Niu J; Song L; Fu L; Li X; Qian S; Guo Q; Song Z
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Nov; 101(45):e31666. PubMed ID: 36397330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A review of the psychometric properties of generic utility measures in multiple sclerosis.
Kuspinar A; Mayo NE
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Aug; 32(8):759-73. PubMed ID: 24846760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation and comparison of EuroQol and short form 6D in chronic prostatitis patients.
Zhao FL; Yue M; Yang H; Wang T; Wu JH; Li SC
Value Health; 2010 Aug; 13(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 20412540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative performance of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D index scores in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Sayah FA; Qiu W; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2017 Aug; 26(8):2057-2066. PubMed ID: 28364183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Measurement Properties of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in COVID-19 Patients in China.
Ding N; Zhou H; Chen C; Chen H; Shi Y
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38641755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of Chinese medicine quality of life assessment scale (CQ-11D) and EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D scales based on Chinese population.
Zhou J; Xu L; Pan J; Wang M; Zhou P; Wang W; Lu S; Zhu W
Qual Life Res; 2024 Jan; 33(1):113-122. PubMed ID: 37695478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
