These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35675713)

  • 21. Automatic GROMACS topology generation and comparisons of force fields for solvation free energy calculations.
    Lundborg M; Lindahl E
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):810-23. PubMed ID: 25343332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using enveloping distribution sampling to compute the free enthalpy difference between right- and left-handed helices of a β-peptide in solution.
    Lin Z; Timmerscheidt TA; van Gunsteren WF
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Aug; 137(6):064108. PubMed ID: 22897256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multistate Method to Efficiently Account for Tautomerism and Protonation in Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations.
    Champion C; Hünenberger PH; Riniker S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 May; 20(10):4350-4362. PubMed ID: 38742760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of Free Energy Methods in AMBER.
    Tsai HC; Tao Y; Lee TS; Merz KM; York DM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5296-5300. PubMed ID: 32551593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhanced conformational sampling using enveloping distribution sampling.
    Lin Z; van Gunsteren WF
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Oct; 139(14):144105. PubMed ID: 24116601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring the Limits of the Generalized CHARMM and AMBER Force Fields through Predictions of Hydration Free Energy of Small Molecules.
    Chakravorty A; Hussain A; Cervantes LF; Lai TT; Brooks CL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 May; 64(10):4089-4101. PubMed ID: 38717640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of a Robust Indirect Approach for MM → QM Free Energy Calculations That Combines Force-Matched Reference Potential and Bennett's Acceptance Ratio Methods.
    Giese TJ; York DM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Oct; 15(10):5543-5562. PubMed ID: 31507179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficiency of alchemical free energy simulations. I. A practical comparison of the exponential formula, thermodynamic integration, and Bennett's acceptance ratio method.
    Bruckner S; Boresch S
    J Comput Chem; 2011 May; 32(7):1303-19. PubMed ID: 21425288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of thermodynamic integration and Bennett acceptance ratio for calculating relative protein-ligand binding free energies.
    de Ruiter A; Boresch S; Oostenbrink C
    J Comput Chem; 2013 May; 34(12):1024-34. PubMed ID: 23335287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Ben-Shalom IY; Lin Z; Radak BK; Lin C; Sherman W; Gilson MK
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Dec; 16(12):7883-7894. PubMed ID: 33206520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Partition coefficients of methylated DNA bases obtained from free energy calculations with molecular electron density derived atomic charges.
    Lara A; Riquelme M; Vöhringer-Martinez E
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Aug; 39(22):1728-1737. PubMed ID: 29752734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Unorthodox uses of Bennett's acceptance ratio method.
    König G; Bruckner S; Boresch S
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Aug; 30(11):1712-8. PubMed ID: 19373838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of three enveloping distribution sampling Hamiltonians for the estimation of multiple free energy differences from a single simulation.
    Christ CD; Van Gunsteren WF
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Aug; 30(11):1664-79. PubMed ID: 19504591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computational scheme for pH-dependent binding free energy calculation with explicit solvent.
    Lee J; Miller BT; Brooks BR
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):231-43. PubMed ID: 26189656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
    Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A replica exchange umbrella sampling (REUS) approach to predict host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL8 challenge.
    Ghorbani M; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Aviat F; Meana-Pañeda R; Klauda JB; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 May; 35(5):667-677. PubMed ID: 33939083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of nine condensed-phase force fields of the GROMOS, CHARMM, OPLS, AMBER, and OpenFF families against experimental cross-solvation free energies.
    Kashefolgheta S; Wang S; Acree WE; Hünenberger PH
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2021 Jun; 23(23):13055-13074. PubMed ID: 34105547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.
    Oostenbrink C; Villa A; Mark AE; van Gunsteren WF
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Oct; 25(13):1656-76. PubMed ID: 15264259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reduced Free Energy Perturbation/Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Method with Unbiased Alchemical Thermodynamic Axis.
    Jiang W; Thirman J; Jo S; Roux B
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Oct; 122(41):9435-9442. PubMed ID: 30253098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exploring the Effect of Enhanced Sampling on Protein Stability Prediction.
    Markthaler D; Fleck M; Stankiewicz B; Hansen N
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Apr; 18(4):2569-2583. PubMed ID: 35298174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.