148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35675976)
1. [Effects of Changing the Source-to-image Receptor Distance Parameter of Scattered X-ray Correction after Exposure on Image Quality in Portable Chest Radiography].
Ijichi T; Matsushima M; Koga E; Kawahara Y; Tani K; Mio M; Obata A; Masumoto T; Kato S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Jul; 78(7):711-718. PubMed ID: 35675976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Heel effect adaptive flat field correction of digital x-ray detectors.
Yu Y; Wang J
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081913. PubMed ID: 23927327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dose reduction potential in scatter-corrected bedside chest radiography using U-net.
Onodera S; Lee Y; Tanaka Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Dec; 13(4):336-347. PubMed ID: 32986183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.
Yano Y; Yabuuchi H; Tanaka N; Morishita J; Akasaka T; Matsuo Y; Sunami S; Kamitani T; Jinnouchi M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Sasaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2050-4. PubMed ID: 23827799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the image quality of conventional chest radiography obtained from a two-layer flat panel detector affected by the internal structure of the detector?
Takarabe S; Kuramoto T; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y; Yoshikawa H; Kato T
Phys Med; 2022 Mar; 95():176-181. PubMed ID: 35219067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of image quality among three X-ray systems for chest radiography: first step in optimisation.
Nocetti D; Ubeda C; Calcagno S; Acevedo J; Pardo D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 25821212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Optimal Beam Quality in Chest Radiography Using CsI-flat Panel Detector for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules].
Oda N; Tabata Y; Mizuta M; Asada Y; Nakano T; Hara T; Kurokawa Y; Aoki T; Uehara S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(4):335-343. PubMed ID: 33883367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM.
Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stationary chest tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array: a feasibility study.
Shan J; Tucker AW; Lee YZ; Heath MD; Wang X; Foos DH; Lu J; Zhou O
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 25478786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a computer simulation technique for low-dose chest radiographs: a phantom study.
Murakami R; Katsuragawa S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 32026403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A flat-panel detector digital radiography and a storage phosphor computed radiography: screening for pneumoconioses.
Takashima Y; Suganuma N; Sakurazawa H; Itoh H; Hirano H; Shida H; Kusaka Y
J Occup Health; 2007 Jan; 49(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 17314465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
