BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35676573)

  • 21. Economic feasibility analysis for an electric public transportation system: Two cases of study in medium sized cities in Mexico.
    Sánchez JT; Del Río JA; Sánchez A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272363. PubMed ID: 35925938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Emissions impacts and benefits of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid services.
    Sioshansi R; Denholm P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Feb; 43(4):1199-204. PubMed ID: 19320180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study.
    Da C; Gu X; Lu C; Hua R; Chang X; Cheng Y; Qian F; Wang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(50):76286-76297. PubMed ID: 35668254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Life cycle CO
    Yu R; Cong L; Hui Y; Zhao D; Yu B
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():154102. PubMed ID: 35218846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Idle emissions from heavy-duty diesel vehicles: review and recent data.
    Khan AB; Clark NN; Thompson GJ; Wayne WS; Gautam M; Lyons DW; Hawelti D
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Oct; 56(10):1404-19. PubMed ID: 17063863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Greenhouse Gas and Noxious Emissions from Dual Fuel Diesel and Natural Gas Heavy Goods Vehicles.
    Stettler ME; Midgley WJ; Swanson JJ; Cebon D; Boies AM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(4):2018-26. PubMed ID: 26757000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Should Transportation Be Transitioned to Ethanol with Carbon Capture and Pipelines or Electricity? A Case Study.
    Jacobson MZ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Nov; 57(44):16843-16850. PubMed ID: 37882448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ensuring greenhouse gas reductions from electric vehicles compared to hybrid gasoline vehicles requires a cleaner U.S. electricity grid.
    Singh M; Yuksel T; Michalek JJ; Azevedo IML
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1639. PubMed ID: 38238349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gaseous Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles: Moving from NEDC to the New WLTP Test Procedure.
    Marotta A; Pavlovic J; Ciuffo B; Serra S; Fontaras G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(14):8315-22. PubMed ID: 26111353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reducing the life cycle environmental impact of electric vehicles through emissions-responsive charging.
    Tang Y; Cockerill TT; Pimm AJ; Yuan X
    iScience; 2021 Dec; 24(12):103499. PubMed ID: 34927031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hourly Power Grid Variations, Electric Vehicle Charging Patterns, and Operating Emissions.
    Miller I; Arbabzadeh M; Gençer E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 54(24):16071-16085. PubMed ID: 33241682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Ontario's Electricity System and the Implications of Electric Vehicle Charging.
    Gai Y; Wang A; Pereira L; Hatzopoulou M; Posen ID
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jul; 53(13):7903-7912. PubMed ID: 31244061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Carbon emission potential of new energy vehicles under different electricity structures.
    Liu B; Zhao Y; Liang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Dec; 30(60):125492-125509. PubMed ID: 37999849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. If Electric Cars Are Good for Reducing Emissions, They Could Be Even Better with Electric Roads.
    Morfeldt J; Shoman W; Johansson DJA; Yeh S; Karlsson S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(13):9593-9603. PubMed ID: 35735988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of carbon emission and primary energy input of a gasoline combustion-powered 2.0 T SUV in China.
    Xie JB
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Nov; 195(1):141. PubMed ID: 36416984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of flexible fuel vehicle and life-cycle fuel consumption and emissions of selected pollutants and greenhouse gases for ethanol 85 versus gasoline.
    Zhai H; Frey HC; Rouphail NM; Gonçalves GA; Farias TL
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Aug; 59(8):912-24. PubMed ID: 19728485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Energy, Emissions, and Cost Impacts of Charging Price Strategies for Electric Vehicles.
    Li X; Jenn A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 May; 56(9):5724-5733. PubMed ID: 35418227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Charging Strategies to Minimize Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Electrified Delivery Vehicles.
    Woody M; Vaishnav P; Craig MT; Lewis GM; Keoleian GA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(14):10108-10120. PubMed ID: 34240846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Variability in Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicle Emission Factors from Trip-Based Real-World Measurements.
    Liu B; Frey HC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12525-34. PubMed ID: 26401623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Climate and environmental effects of electric vehicles versus compressed natural gas vehicles in China: a life-cycle analysis at provincial level.
    Huo H; Zhang Q; Liu F; He K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(3):1711-8. PubMed ID: 23276251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.