178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35678321)
1. Physiological Demands and Characteristics of Movement During Simulated Combat.
Larsson J; Olsson MC; Bremander A; Dencker M
Mil Med; 2023 Nov; 188(11-12):3496-3505. PubMed ID: 35678321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiorespiratory responses induced by various military field tasks.
Pihlainen K; Santtila M; Häkkinen K; Lindholm H; Kyröläinen H
Mil Med; 2014 Feb; 179(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 24491620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and application of a questionnaire to self-rate physical work demands for ground combat soldiers.
Larsson J; Dencker M; Olsson MC; Bremander A
Appl Ergon; 2020 Feb; 83():103002. PubMed ID: 31747636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiorespiratory responses of load carriage in female and male soldiers.
Larsson J; Dencker M; Bremander A; Olsson MC
Appl Ergon; 2022 May; 101():103710. PubMed ID: 35217405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lower-body muscular power predicts performance on urban combat simulation.
Sankari M; Vaara JP; Pihlainen K; Ojanen T; Kyröläinen H
Work; 2024; 77(4):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 38517830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Reliability of Simulations of Physically Demanding Tasks Performed by Combat Arms Soldiers.
Foulis SA; Redmond JE; Frykman PN; Warr BJ; Zambraski EJ; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Dec; 31(12):3245-3252. PubMed ID: 28368954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Combat Deployment on Anthropometrics and Physiological Status of U.S. Army Special Operations Forces Soldiers.
Farina EK; Taylor JC; Means GE; Williams KW; Murphy NE; Margolis LM; Pasiakos SM; Lieberman HR; McClung JP
Mil Med; 2017 Mar; 182(3):e1659-e1668. PubMed ID: 28290940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metabolic Costs of Military Load Carriage over Complex Terrain.
Looney DP; Santee WR; Karis AJ; Blanchard LA; Rome MN; Carter AJ; Potter AW
Mil Med; 2018 Sep; 183(9-10):e357-e362. PubMed ID: 29860513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Twelve weeks of concurrent resistance and interval training improves military occupational task performance in men and women.
Sterczala AJ; Krajewski KT; Peterson PA; Sekel NM; Lovalekar M; Wardle SL; O'Leary TJ; Greeves JP; Flanagan SD; Connaboy C; Nindl BC
Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Dec; 23(12):2411-2424. PubMed ID: 37517090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of modern military backpack loads on walking speed and cardiometabolic responses of US Army Soldiers.
Looney DP; Doughty EM; Figueiredo PS; Vangala SV; Pryor JL; Santee WR; McClung HL; Potter AW
Appl Ergon; 2021 Jul; 94():103395. PubMed ID: 33652153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Two Training Programs Designed to Enhance Performance on the Army Combat Fitness Test Among ROTC Cadets.
Newman A; Armonda A; Braun B
Mil Med; 2022 Aug; 187(9-10):e1030-e1036. PubMed ID: 35064262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional physical training improves women's military occupational performance.
Nindl BC; Eagle SR; Frykman PN; Palmer C; Lammi E; Reynolds K; Allison K; Harman E
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S91-S97. PubMed ID: 28986086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of Soldiers' Cardiorespiratory Fitness on Physiological Responses and Dropouts During a Loaded Long-distance March.
Oeschger R; Roos L; Wyss T; Buller MJ; Veenstra BJ; Gilgen-Ammann R
Mil Med; 2022 Jan; 188(7-8):e1903-9. PubMed ID: 35015894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Short-Term Reliability of the Conceptualised 'Combat Readiness Assessment'.
Moore D; Tayler M; Moore S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a valid simulation assessment for a military dismounted assault task.
Silk AJ; Billing DC
Mil Med; 2013 Mar; 178(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 23707119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physiological factors in infantry operations.
Knapik J; Daniels W; Murphy M; Fitzgerald P; Drews F; Vogel J
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1990; 60(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2347328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiological Readiness and Resilience: Pillars of Military Preparedness.
Szivak TK; Kraemer WJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S34-9. PubMed ID: 26506195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concept for a Predeployment Assessment of Basic Military Fitness in the German Armed Forces.
Rohde U; Sievert A; Rüther T; Witzki A; Leyk D
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S211-5. PubMed ID: 26506190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing elite soldiers' perceptions of psychological and physical demands during military training.
Thomas JL; Adler AB; Wittels P; Enne R; Johannes B
Mil Med; 2004 Jul; 169(7):526-30. PubMed ID: 15291184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
