These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35678792)

  • 1. Effect of Simulated Mass-Tunable Auxetic Midsole on Vertical Ground Reaction Force.
    Ford RR; Misra M; Mohanty AK; Brandon SCE
    J Biomech Eng; 2022 Nov; 144(11):. PubMed ID: 35678792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do harder midsoles facilitate propulsion and do softer midsoles increase shock attenuation during taking-off and landing of scissor jump?
    Lin YJ; Shiang TY; Liu TH; Lee YH; Lee SC; Hsu WC; Chang CC
    Sports Biomech; 2022 Feb; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 35184670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of various midsole densities of basketball shoes on impact attenuation during landing activities.
    Zhang S; Clowers K; Kohstall C; Yu YJ
    J Appl Biomech; 2005 Feb; 21(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 16131701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes.
    Baltich J; Maurer C; Nigg BM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125196. PubMed ID: 25897963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards a footwear design tool: influence of shoe midsole properties and ground stiffness on the impact force during running.
    Ly QH; Alaoui A; Erlicher S; Baly L
    J Biomech; 2010 Jan; 43(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 19931083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer simulation of the effects of shoe cushioning on internal and external loading during running impacts.
    Miller RH; Hamill J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Aug; 12(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 19225961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of shoe cushioning on landing impact forces and spatiotemporal parameters during running: results from a randomized trial including 800+ recreational runners.
    Malisoux L; Delattre N; Meyer C; Gette P; Urhausen A; Theisen D
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2021 Jul; 21(7):985-993. PubMed ID: 32781913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a method for quantifying the midsole reaction model parameters.
    Naemi R; Chockalingam N
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16(12):1273-7. PubMed ID: 22494629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of midsole hardness and surface type cushioning on landing impact in heel-strike runners.
    Yang Z; Cui C; Zhou Z; Zheng Z; Yan S; Liu H; Qu F; Zhang K
    J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 165():111996. PubMed ID: 38377740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ground Reaction Force Differences between Bionic Shoes and Neutral Running Shoes in Recreational Male Runners before and after a 5 km Run.
    Jiang X; Zhou H; Quan W; Hu Q; Baker JS; Gu Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(18):. PubMed ID: 34574713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relevance of Frequency-Domain Analyses to Relate Shoe Cushioning, Ground Impact Forces and Running Injury Risk: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial With 800+ Recreational Runners.
    Malisoux L; Gette P; Backes A; Delattre N; Cabri J; Theisen D
    Front Sports Act Living; 2021; 3():744658. PubMed ID: 34859204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of muscle stiffness and damping on simulated impact force peaks during running.
    Nigg BM; Liu W
    J Biomech; 1999 Aug; 32(8):849-56. PubMed ID: 10433427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ground reaction force differences between running shoes, racing flats, and distance spikes in runners.
    Logan S; Hunter I; J Ty Hopkins JT; Feland JB; Parcell AC
    J Sports Sci Med; 2010; 9(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 24149399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinetics and perception of basketball landing in various heights and footwear cushioning.
    Wei Q; Wang Z; Woo J; Liebenberg J; Park SK; Ryu J; Lam WK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201758. PubMed ID: 30092009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of shoe wearing time and midsole hardness on ground reaction forces, ankle stability and perceived comfort in basketball landing.
    Lam WK; Liu H; Wu GQ; Liu ZL; Sun W
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Oct; 37(20):2347-2355. PubMed ID: 31221050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Running ground reaction forces across footwear conditions are predicted from the motion of two body mass components.
    Udofa AB; Clark KP; Ryan LJ; Weyand PG
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2019 May; 126(5):1315-1325. PubMed ID: 30763160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Midsole material-related force control during heel-toe running.
    Kersting UG; Brüggemann GP
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16700401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Running ground reaction force complexity at the initial stance phase increased with ageing.
    Zhang S; Li Y; Li L
    Sports Biomech; 2021 Aug; 20(5):619-628. PubMed ID: 30942127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of midsole thickness on ground reaction force, ankle stability, and sports performances in four basketball movements.
    Teng J; Qu F; Shen S; Jia SW; Lam WK
    Sports Biomech; 2022 Sep; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 36047733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shock attenuation characteristics of three different military boots during gait.
    Muniz AMS; Bini RR
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():59-65. PubMed ID: 28738226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.