These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35679292)

  • 1. Power and lie detection.
    Ulatowska J; Cislak A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269121. PubMed ID: 35679292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.
    Street CN; Richardson DC
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):342-55. PubMed ID: 26301728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When and Why Being Ostracized Affects Veracity Judgments.
    Eck J; Schoel C; Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Mar; 46(3):454-468. PubMed ID: 31313631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Limits of Conscious Deception Detection: When Reliance on False Deception Cues Contributes to Inaccurate Judgments.
    Stel M; Schwarz A; van Dijk E; van Knippenberg A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1331. PubMed ID: 32636787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of lie detection performance.
    Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is It the Judge, the Sender, or Just the Individual Message? Disentangling Person and Message Effects on Variation in Lie-Detection Judgments.
    Volz S; Reinhard MA; Müller P
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Nov; 18(6):1368-1387. PubMed ID: 36791692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use-the-best heuristic facilitates deception detection.
    Verschuere B; Lin CC; Huismann S; Kleinberg B; Willemse M; Mei ECJ; van Goor T; Löwy LHS; Appiah OK; Meijer E
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 May; 7(5):718-728. PubMed ID: 36941469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Group discussion improves lie detection.
    Klein N; Epley N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7460-5. PubMed ID: 26015581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcranial Current Stimulation of the Temporoparietal Junction Improves Lie Detection.
    Sowden S; Wright GR; Banissy MJ; Catmur C; Bird G
    Curr Biol; 2015 Sep; 25(18):2447-51. PubMed ID: 26344092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103080. PubMed ID: 32413731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lie-detection biases among male police interrogators, prisoners, and laypersons.
    Elaad E
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1047-56. PubMed ID: 20229908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
    Ten Brinke L; Lee JJ; Carney DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):560-578. PubMed ID: 30869984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
    Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidance to detect deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales: are verbal content cues useful to detect false accusations?
    Sporer SL; Masip J; Cramer M
    Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 24720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
    Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.