112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35680047)
1. Elevated IsoPSA Selects for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Without a Preference for Any Particular Adverse Histopathologic or Radiographic Feature.
Benidir T; Hofmann M; Lone Z; Nguyen JK; Purysko AS; Stovsky M; Klein EA; Weight CJ
Urology; 2022 Oct; 168():150-155. PubMed ID: 35680047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using IsoPSA With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score May Help Refine Biopsy Decision Making in Patients With Elevated PSA.
Benidir T; Lone Z; Wood A; Abdallah N; Campbell R; Bajic P; Purysko A; Nguyen JK; Kaouk J; Haber GP; Eltemamy M; Stein R; Haywood S; Klein EA; Almassi N; Campbell SC; Abouassaly R; Weight CJ
Urology; 2023 Jun; 176():115-120. PubMed ID: 36965817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy of biopsy naïve men diagnosed with MRI targeted biopsy alone without concomitant standard systematic sampling.
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Maresca D; Sabatini I; Cordima G; Brescia A; Verweij F; Garelli G; Mistretta FA; Cioffi A; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):929.e11-929.e19. PubMed ID: 32600928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical validation of IsoPSA, a single parameter, structure-focused assay for improved detection of prostate cancer: A prospective, multicenter study.
Klein EA; Partin A; Lotan Y; Baniel J; Dineen M; Hafron J; Manickam K; Pliskin M; Wagner M; Kestranek A; Stovsky M
Urol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):408.e9-408.e18. PubMed ID: 35840465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Single-parameter, Structure-based IsoPSA Assay Demonstrates Improved Diagnostic Accuracy for Detection of Any Prostate Cancer and High-grade Prostate Cancer Compared to a Concentration-based Assay of Total Prostate-specific Antigen: A Preliminary Report.
Klein EA; Chait A; Hafron JM; Kernen KM; Manickam K; Stephenson AJ; Wagner M; Zhu H; Kestranek A; Zaslavsky B; Stovsky M
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):942-949. PubMed ID: 28396176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Gao Y; Jiang CY; Mao SK; Cui D; Hao KY; Zhao W; Jiang Q; Ruan Y; Xia SJ; Han BM
Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(4):639-43. PubMed ID: 26732103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The combination of prostate MRI PI-RADS scoring system and a genomic classifier is associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Benidir T; Lone Z; Nguyen JK; Ward R; Hofmann M; Klein EA; Mian OY; Weight CJ; Purysko AS
Br J Radiol; 2023 Mar; 96(1144):20220663. PubMed ID: 36745009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative MRI PI-RADS scores are associated with prostate cancer upstaging on surgical pathology.
Pockros B; Stensland KD; Parries M; Frankenberger E; Canes D; Moinzadeh A
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):352-358. PubMed ID: 34878175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.
Faisal FA; Sundi D; Pierorazio PM; Ball MW; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Carter HB; Bivalacqua TJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E120-E129. PubMed ID: 24731026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IsoPSA
Scovell JM; Hettel D; Abouassaly R; Almassi N; Berglund R; Breaux T; Weight C; Isac W; Zampini A; Stark E; Rochelle R; Kestranek A; Stovsky M; Klein EA
Urol Pract; 2022 Mar; 9(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 37145695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PI-RADS version 2 for prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason Score 7 (3+4) prostate cancer.
Woo S; Kim SY; Lee J; Kim SH; Cho JY
Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3580-7. PubMed ID: 26847042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the Prostate Health Index for detection of prostate cancer: results from a large academic practice.
Tosoian JJ; Druskin SC; Andreas D; Mullane P; Chappidi M; Joo S; Ghabili K; Agostino J; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Schaeffer EM; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Jun; 20(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 28117387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.
Pierorazio PM; Ross AE; Lin BM; Epstein JI; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP; Schaeffer EM
BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1122-8. PubMed ID: 22373045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Visible Tumor (PI-RADS ≥ 3) on Upgrading and Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Low Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Biopsy Core Based Analysis.
Özkan A; Köseoğlu E; Kılıç M; Baydar DE; Sağlıcan Y; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Kordan Y; Kiremit MC; Çil B; Tuğcu V; Bakır B; Esen T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2022 Feb; 20(1):e61-e67. PubMed ID: 34750082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.
Chalfin HJ; Dinizo M; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Humphreys E; Han M
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1684-9. PubMed ID: 22788795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy.
Koie T; Mitsuzuka K; Yoneyama T; Narita S; Kawamura S; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C; Yoneyama T; Tobisawa Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Feb; 20(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 24771079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
