136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35681745)
1. Genetic Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
Li S; Nguyen TL; Nguyen-Dumont T; Dowty JG; Dite GS; Ye Z; Trinh HN; Evans CF; Tan M; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Southey MC
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 35681745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Familial Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
Nguyen TL; Li S; Dowty JG; Dite GS; Ye Z; Nguyen-Dumont T; Trinh HN; Evans CF; Tan M; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Giles GG; Southey MC; Hopper JL
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 35326633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Cancer Risk Associations with Digital Mammographic Density by Pixel Brightness Threshold and Mammographic System.
Nguyen TL; Choi YH; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh NH; Li S; Dite GS; Kim MS; Brennan PC; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Song YM; Hopper JL
Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):433-442. PubMed ID: 29040039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure.
Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Maskarinec G; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; MacInnis RJ; Dugué PA; Dowty JG; Jenkins MA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Int J Cancer; 2021 May; 148(9):2193-2202. PubMed ID: 33197272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of contralateral breast cancer risk with mammographic density defined at higher-than-conventional intensity thresholds.
Watt GP; Knight JA; Nguyen TL; Reiner AS; Malone KE; John EM; Lynch CF; Brooks JD; Woods M; Liang X; Bernstein L; Pike MC; Hopper JL; Bernstein JL
Int J Cancer; 2022 Oct; 151(8):1304-1309. PubMed ID: 35315524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A genome-wide association study of mammographic texture variation.
Liu Y; Chen H; Heine J; Lindstrom S; Turman C; Warner ET; Winham SJ; Vachon CM; Tamimi RM; Kraft P; Jiang X
Breast Cancer Res; 2022 Nov; 24(1):76. PubMed ID: 36344993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Explaining variance in the cumulus mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk: a twins and sisters study.
Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Dite GS; Stone J; Apicella C; Bui M; Macinnis RJ; Odefrey F; Cawson JN; Treloar SA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Dec; 22(12):2395-403. PubMed ID: 24130221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Going Beyond Conventional Mammographic Density to Discover Novel Mammogram-Based Predictors of Breast Cancer Risk.
Hopper JL; Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Song YM; Sung J; Dite GS; Dowty JG; Li S
J Clin Med; 2020 Feb; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32110975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1), daily cycling estrogen and mammographic density phenotypes.
Fjeldheim FN; Frydenberg H; Flote VG; McTiernan A; Furberg AS; Ellison PT; Barrett ES; Wilsgaard T; Jasienska G; Ursin G; Wist EA; Thune I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Oct; 16(1):776. PubMed ID: 27717337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of mammographic density among women with a strong family history of breast cancer.
Moran O; Eisen A; Demsky R; Blackmore K; Knight JA; Panchal S; Ginsburg O; Zbuk K; Yaffe M; Metcalfe KA; Narod SA; Kotsopoulos J
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):631. PubMed ID: 31242899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome-wide association study of peripheral blood DNA methylation and conventional mammographic density measures.
Li S; Dugué PA; Baglietto L; Severi G; Wong EM; Nguyen TL; Stone J; English DR; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Milne RL
Int J Cancer; 2019 Oct; 145(7):1768-1773. PubMed ID: 30694562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The association of mammographic density with risk of contralateral breast cancer and change in density with treatment in the WECARE study.
Knight JA; Blackmore KM; Fan J; Malone KE; John EM; Lynch CF; Vachon CM; Bernstein L; Brooks JD; Reiner AS; Liang X; Woods M; ; Bernstein JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Mar; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 29566728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer.
Cheddad A; Czene K; Eriksson M; Li J; Easton D; Hall P; Humphreys K
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110690. PubMed ID: 25329322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes.
Nickson C; Arzhaeva Y; Aitken Z; Elgindy T; Buckley M; Li M; English DR; Kavanagh AM
Breast Cancer Res; 2013; 15(5):R80. PubMed ID: 24020331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal and perinatal correlates of adult mammographic breast density.
Cerhan JR; Sellers TA; Janney CA; Pankratz VS; Brandt KR; Vachon CM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Jun; 14(6):1502-8. PubMed ID: 15941963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variants in 6q25.1 Are Associated with Mammographic Density in Malaysian Chinese Women.
Mariapun S; Ho WK; Kang PC; Li J; Lindström S; Yip CH; Teo SH
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Feb; 25(2):327-33. PubMed ID: 26677210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
