BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35681783)

  • 1. Interobserver Reliability and the Sigmoid Takeoff-An Interobserver Study.
    Pedersen MRV; Otto PO; Vagn-Hansen C; Sørensen T; Rafaelsen SR
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 35681783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MRI interobserver reliability in rectal tumor angulation.
    Pedersen MR; Otto PO; Precht H; Rafaelsen SR
    Acta Radiol Open; 2022 Feb; 11(2):20584601221081292. PubMed ID: 35223087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers.
    Han YE; Park BJ; Sung DJ; Kim MJ; Han NY; Sim KC; Cho SB; Kim J; Kim SH; An H
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Feb; 46(2):449-458. PubMed ID: 32691110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the sigmoid take-off with other definitions of the rectosigmoid junction: A retrospective comparative cohort analysis.
    Li F; Wang B; Lu S; Wang Y; Sun T; Wang H; Zhou X; Fu W
    Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():168-174. PubMed ID: 32650119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of rectal tumor height from the anal verge on MRI: a comparison of internal versus external anal sphincter.
    Bates DDB; Fuqua JL; Zheng J; Capanu M; Golia Pernicka JS; Javed-Tayyab S; Paroder V; Petkovska I; Gollub MJ
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Mar; 46(3):867-872. PubMed ID: 32940753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transvaginal sonography accurately measures lesion-to-anal-verge distance in women with deep endometriosis of the rectosigmoid.
    Aas-Eng MK; Dauser B; Lieng M; Diep LM; Leonardi M; Condous G; Hudelist G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 56(5):766-772. PubMed ID: 32068921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can CT replace MRI in preoperative assessment of the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer?
    Maizlin ZV; Brown JA; So G; Brown C; Phang TP; Walker ML; Kirby JM; Vora P; Tiwari P
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Mar; 53(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 20173478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection].
    Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pelvic CT in addition to MRI to differentiate between rectal and sigmoid cancer on imaging using the sigmoid take-off as a landmark.
    Bogveradze N; Maas M; El Khababi N; Schurink NW; Lahaye MJ; Bakers FC; Tanis PJ; Kusters M; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RG; Lambregts DM
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Feb; 64(2):467-472. PubMed ID: 35404168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of Anatomic Bony Landmark Localization of the ACL Femoral Footprint Using 3D MRI.
    Sivakumaran T; Jaffer R; Marwan Y; Hart A; Radu A; Burman M; Martineau PA; Powell T
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2021 Oct; 9(10):23259671211042603. PubMed ID: 34692880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra-and interobserver reliability of determining the femoral footprint of the torn anterior cruciate ligament on MRI scans.
    Zee MJM; Sulaihem RA; Diercks RL; van den Akker-Scheek I
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 May; 22(1):493. PubMed ID: 34049511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting dentate line invasion in low rectal cancer.
    Tatsumoto S; Itoh T; Takahama J; Marugami N; Minamiguchi K; Tanaka T; Koyama F; Morita K; Kichikawa K
    Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 38(6):539-546. PubMed ID: 32100185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The sigmoid take-off as a landmark to distinguish rectal from sigmoid tumours on MRI: Reproducibility, pitfalls and potential impact on treatment stratification.
    Bogveradze N; Lambregts DMJ; El Khababi N; Dresen RC; Maas M; Kusters M; Tanis PJ; Beets-Tan RGH;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):237-244. PubMed ID: 34583878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Patients with Testicular Tumors-Intra- and Interobserver Variability.
    Pedersen MRV; Loft MK; Dam C; Rasmussen LÆL; Timm S
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):837-847. PubMed ID: 35200570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gross tumour volume delineation in anal cancer on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI - Reproducibility between radiologists and radiation oncologists and impact of reader experience level and DWI image quality.
    Min LA; Vacher YJL; Dewit L; Donker M; Sofia C; van Triest B; Bos P; van Griethuysen JJW; Maas M; Beets-Tan RGH; Lambregts DMJ
    Radiother Oncol; 2020 Sep; 150():81-88. PubMed ID: 32540336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The sigmoid take-off: An anatomical imaging definition of the rectum validated on specimen analysis.
    D'Souza N; Lord A; Shaw A; Patel A; Balyasnikova S; Tudyka V; Abulafi M; Moran B; Rasheed S; Tekkis P; Terlizzo M; West N; Quirke P; Brown G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1668-1672. PubMed ID: 32061459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in landmarks for the rectum: an MRI study.
    D'Souza N; Balyasnikova S; Tudyka V; Lord A; Shaw A; Abulafi M; Tekkis P; Brown G
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Oct; 20(10):O304-O309. PubMed ID: 30176118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Banitalebi H; Espeland A; Anvar M; Hermansen E; Hellum C; Brox JI; Myklebust TÅ; Indrekvam K; Brisby H; Weber C; Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Grundnes O; Negård A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 35033042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra- and interobserver variability in the diagnosis of GERD by real-time MRI.
    Seif Amir Hosseini A; Beham A; Uhlig J; Streit U; Uhlig A; Ellenrieder V; Joseph AA; Voit D; Frahm J; Uecker M; Lotz J; Biggemann L
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():14-19. PubMed ID: 29857860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging as the method of choice to determine the distance to the anal margin in rectal cancer.
    Lorenzo Liñán MÁ; García Armengol J; Martín Martín GP; Martínez Sanjuán V; Roig Vila JV
    Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2021 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 34493375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.