These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35682073)

  • 1. Economic Feasibility Study of a Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Integration Project in an Oil-Driven Economy: The Case of the State of Kuwait.
    Naseeb A; Ramadan A; Al-Salem SM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Techno-Economic Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment of CO
    Abuov Y; Serik G; Lee W
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 56(12):8571-8580. PubMed ID: 35653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
    Whittington HW
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
    Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coal and biomass to fuels and power.
    Williams RH; Liu G; Kreutz TG; Larson ED
    Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2011; 2():529-53. PubMed ID: 22432630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping the economy of coal power plants retrofitted with post-combustion and biomass co-firing carbon capture in China.
    Yuan J; Wang Y; Zhang W; Zhang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):47438-47454. PubMed ID: 36738409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12908-12917. PubMed ID: 28968494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey.
    Ağralı S; Üçtuğ FG; Türkmen BA
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 215():305-315. PubMed ID: 29574208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage.
    Hardisty PE; Sivapalan M; Brooks P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 May; 8(5):1460-77. PubMed ID: 21655130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Techno-economic analysis of electricity generation from household sewage sludge in different regions of Nigeria.
    Ogbu CA; Alexiou Ivanova T; Ewemoje TA; Okolie CO; Roubík H
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 903():166554. PubMed ID: 37633372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants.
    Rubin ES; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3076-84. PubMed ID: 22332665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method for the technical, financial, economic and environmental pre-feasibility study of geothermal power plants by RETScreen - Ecuador's case study.
    Moya D; Paredes J; Kaparaju P
    MethodsX; 2018; 5():524-531. PubMed ID: 29872640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oxygen Enrichment Membranes for Kuwait Power Plants: A Case Study.
    Alqaheem Y; Alswaileh F
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33803031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.
    Anderson JJ; Rode DC; Zhai H; Fischbeck PS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 56(16):11162-11171. PubMed ID: 35926127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electricity from fossil fuels without CO2 emissions: assessing the costs of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in U.S. electricity markets.
    Johnson TL; Keith DW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Oct; 51(10):1452-9. PubMed ID: 11686250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the most likely low-emission electricity production systems in Estonia.
    Baird ZS; Neshumayev D; Järvik O; Powell KM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261780. PubMed ID: 34968401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A life cycle assessment of coal-fired thermal power plants with post-combustion control techniques: an India scenario.
    Malode S; Prakash R; Mohanta JC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(39):90639-90655. PubMed ID: 37462868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can hybrid solar-fossil power plants mitigate CO2 at lower cost than PV or CSP?
    Moore J; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):2487-93. PubMed ID: 23379665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.