These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35682196)
1. Evaluating the Heterogeneity Effect of Fertilizer Use Intensity on Agricultural Eco-Efficiency in China: Evidence from a Panel Quantile Regression Model. Hou M; Xi Z; Zhao S Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Alongside China's Carbon Neutrality Targets. Cheng C; Li J; Qiu Y; Gao C; Gao Q Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial-temporal differentiation and its influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency in China based on geographic detector. Wang YQ; Yao SB; Hou MY; Jia L; Li YY; Deng YJ; Zhang X Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2021 Nov; 32(11):4039-4049. PubMed ID: 34898120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of the spatial characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency: evidence from Anhui Province, China, during the period 2011-2018. Wu Y; Rahman RA; Yu Q Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Feb; 194(3):154. PubMed ID: 35132444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatio-Temporal Difference in Agricultural Eco-Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors Based on the SBM-Tobit Models in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Shi L; Shi X; Yang F; Zhang L Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental Regulation, Rural Residents' Health Investment, and Agricultural Eco-Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis Based on 31 Chinese Provinces. Zhou K; Zheng X; Long Y; Wu J; Li J Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35270816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-measurement and influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency under the 'dual carbon' target in China. Yang L; Guan Z; Chen S; He Z Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e24944. PubMed ID: 38318057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New Digital Infrastructure's Impact on Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Improvement: Influence Mechanism and Empirical Test-Evidence from China. Ren J; Chen X; Gao T; Chen H; Shi L; Shi M Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36834245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial-temporal characteristics and driving factors of the chemical fertilizer supply/demand correlation network in China. Qu H; Yin Y; Xing W; Wang W; Zhou C; Li J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(53):80532-80548. PubMed ID: 35718849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial analysis of factors affecting fertilizer use efficiency in China: an empirical study based on geographical weighted regression model. Bai X; Zhang T; Tian S; Wang Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(13):16663-16681. PubMed ID: 33389465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does agricultural mechanization improve agricultural environment efficiency? Evidence from China's planting industry. Zhu Y; Zhang Y; Piao H Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(35):53673-53690. PubMed ID: 35290580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Spatial Correlation of Its Determinants in China: A Geographically Weighted Regression Approach. Bai X; Zhang T; Tian S Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(23):. PubMed ID: 33261075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of atmospheric environmental efficiency in China. Ma X; Zhao X; Zhang L; Zhou Y; Chen H Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(10):12428-12440. PubMed ID: 33074431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Driving factors of total-factor substitution efficiency of chemical fertilizer input and related environmental regulation policy: A case study of Zhejiang Province. Yang J; Lin Y Environ Pollut; 2020 Aug; 263(Pt B):114541. PubMed ID: 32289649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Will the substitution of capital for labor increase the use of chemical fertilizer in agriculture? Analysis based on provincial panel data in China. Lei Z; Tu T; Li X Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(8):21052-21071. PubMed ID: 36264467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Agricultural Credit Input Promote Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from Spatial Panel Data of 30 Provinces in China. Wang F; Du L; Tian M Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatiotemporal Changes of Chemical Fertilizer Application and Its Environmental Risks in China from 2000 to 2019. Guo Y; Wang J Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34831667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating China Food's Fertilizer Reduction and Efficiency Initiative Using a Double Stochastic Meta-Frontier Method. Chen X; Pu M; Zhong Y Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 35742586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Agricultural Division of Labor on Fertilizer Reduction Application: Evidence from Western China. Zhou S; Qing C; He J; Xu D Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36900798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Response and Its Influencing Factors from the Perspective of Rural Population Outflowing: A Case Study in Qinan County, China. Zong Y; Ma L; Shi Z; Gong M Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36673772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]