These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35683500)

  • 1. When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.
    Masiero G; Cardaioli F; Rodinò G; Tarantini G
    J Clin Med; 2022 May; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 35683500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a critical appraisal.
    Masiero G; Cardaioli F; Tarantini G
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Jun; 20(6):443-454. PubMed ID: 35587216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current clinical management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    El Nasasra A; Zeymer U
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2021 Jan; 19(1):41-46. PubMed ID: 33289436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coronary revascularization and circulatory support strategies in patients with myocardial infarction, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and cardiogenic shock: Insights from an international survey.
    Smilowitz NR; Galloway AC; Ohman EM; Rao SV; Bangalore S; Katz SD; Hochman JS
    Am Heart J; 2020 Jul; 225():55-59. PubMed ID: 32474205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex-Specific Management in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial.
    Rubini Gimenez M; Zeymer U; Desch S; de Waha-Thiele S; Ouarrak T; Poess J; Meyer-Saraei R; Schneider S; Fuernau G; Stepinska J; Huber K; Windecker S; Montalescot G; Savonitto S; Jeger RV; Thiele H
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 13(3):e008537. PubMed ID: 32151161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-Analysis of the Optimal Percutaneous Revascularization Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction, Cardiogenic Shock, and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.
    Tarantini G; D'Amico G; Tellaroli P; Colombo C; Brener SJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 May; 119(10):1525-1531. PubMed ID: 28341358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Therapeutic Advances in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.
    Chioncel O; Collins SP; Ambrosy AP; Pang PS; Radu RI; Antohi EL; Masip J; Butler J; Iliescu VA
    Am J Ther; 2019; 26(2):e234-e247. PubMed ID: 30839372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Lemor A; Basir MB; Patel K; Kolski B; Kaki A; Kapur NK; Riley R; Finley J; Goldsweig A; Aronow HD; Belford PM; Tehrani B; Truesdell AG; Lasorda D; Bharadwaj A; Hanson I; LaLonde T; Gorgis S; O'Neill W;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(10):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 32360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Design and rationale of CULPRIT-SHOCK trial.
    Thiele H; Desch S; Piek JJ; Stepinska J; Oldroyd K; Serpytis P; Montalescot G; Noc M; Huber K; Fuernau G; de Waha S; Meyer-Saraei R; Schneider S; Windecker S; Savonitto S; Briggs A; Torremante P; Vrints C; Schuler G; Ceglarek U; Thiery J; Zeymer U;
    Am Heart J; 2016 Feb; 172():160-9. PubMed ID: 26856228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of multivessel vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Evidence from an updated meta-analysis.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Kakouros N; Malhotra R; Kolte D; Feldman DN; Abbott JD; Fisher DZ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 94(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 30593731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporary support strategies for cardiogenic shock: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, percutaneous ventricular assist devices and surgically placed extracorporeal ventricular assist devices.
    Massey HT; Choi JH; Maynes EJ; Tchantchaleishvili V
    Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Jan; 8(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 30854310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revascularization in cardiogenic shock.
    Freund A; Desch S; Thiele H
    Herz; 2020 Sep; 45(6):537-541. PubMed ID: 32548775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct-Related Artery-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.
    Lee JM; Rhee TM; Kim HK; Hwang D; Lee SH; Choi KH; Kim J; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi JH; Choi SH; Koo BK; Chae SC; Cho MC; Kim CJ; Kim JH; Kim HS; Gwon HC; Jeong MH; Hahn JY;
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Dec; 8(24):e013870. PubMed ID: 31818215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Update in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.
    Bagai J; Brilakis ES
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2019 Mar; 21(4):17. PubMed ID: 30828750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of Culprit Lesion Location With Outcomes of Culprit-Lesion-Only vs Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Farhan S; Vogel B; Montalescot G; Barthelemy O; Zeymer U; Desch S; de Waha-Thiele S; Maier LS; Sandri M; Akin I; Fuernau G; Ouarrak T; Hauguel-Moreau M; Schneider S; Thiele H; Huber K
    JAMA Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 5(12):1329-1337. PubMed ID: 32845312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing of mechanical circulatory support during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Archilletti F; Giuliani L; Dangas GD; Ricci F; Benedetto U; Radico F; Gallina S; Rossi S; Maddestra N; Zimarino M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 99(4):998-1005. PubMed ID: 35182020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The prognostic impact of revascularization strategy in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Insights from the British Columbia Cardiac Registry.
    McNeice A; Nadra IJ; Robinson SD; Fretz E; Ding L; Fung A; Aymong E; Chan AW; Hodge S; Webb J; Sheth T; Jolly SS; Mehta SR; Della Siega A; Wood DA; Iqbal MB;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(5):E356-E367. PubMed ID: 29698573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Asleh R; Resar JR
    J Clin Med; 2019 Aug; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 31412669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.