These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35683605)

  • 21. Comparison of single- and multi-incision minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched study.
    Lee JM; Chen SC; Yang SM; Tseng YF; Yang PW; Huang PM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2925-2931. PubMed ID: 27826778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
    Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
    Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do alterations in plasma albumin and prealbumin after minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma influence the incidence of cervical anastomotic leak?
    Wang YJ; Liu XH; Mei LY; Li KK; Jiang YG; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3943-9. PubMed ID: 26694179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Postoperative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ozawa S; Koyanagi K; Ninomiya Y; Yatabe K; Higuchi T
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2020 Mar; 4(2):126-134. PubMed ID: 32258977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Single Intercostal Space Thoracoscopic Approach for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
    Pan S; Wang L; Wu M; Wang Q; Shen G; Chen G
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 28504587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of postoperative complications between different operation methods for esophageal cancer.
    Ding Q; Zhou W; Xue Y; Han X; Yin D; Xue L; Luo J
    Thorac Cancer; 2019 Aug; 10(8):1669-1672. PubMed ID: 31245903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage and pneumonia after esophagectomy for cancer.
    Goense L; van Rossum PS; Tromp M; Joore HC; van Dijk D; Kroese AC; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 27353216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prediction of postoperative inflammatory complications after esophageal cancer surgery based on early changes in the C-reactive protein level in patients who received perioperative steroid therapy and enhanced recovery after surgery care: a retrospective analysis.
    Kano K; Aoyama T; Nakajima T; Maezawa Y; Hayashi T; Yamada T; Sato T; Oshima T; Rino Y; Masuda M; Cho H; Yoshikawa T; Ogata T
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):812. PubMed ID: 29202716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Adaption of surgical procedure in the treatment of submucosal esophageal cancer].
    Hao S; Li Z; Fang W; Mao T; Zhao H; Zhong C
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 18(9):885-8. PubMed ID: 26404683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive esophagectomy via Sweet approach in combination with cervical mediastinoscopy is a valuable approach for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.
    Ma J; Wang W; Zhang B; Li X; Wu J; Wu Z
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Jan; 46(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 33678638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Mao T; Fang W; Gu Z; Guo X; Ji C; Chen W
    Thorac Cancer; 2015 May; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 26273376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Endoscopic assessment 1 day after esophagectomy for predicting cervical esophagogastric anastomosis-relating complications.
    Fujiwara H; Nakajima Y; Kawada K; Tokairin Y; Miyawaki Y; Okada T; Nagai K; Kawano T
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1564-71. PubMed ID: 26169637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Association of postoperative outcome with fasting plasma glucose and risk factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
    Duan X; Gong L; Shang X; Jiang H; Tang P; Yu Z
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1004-1008. PubMed ID: 27680068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does staged surgical training for minimally invasive esophagectomy have an impact on short-term outcomes?
    Ishiyama K; Fujita T; Fujiwara H; Kurita D; Oguma J; Katai H; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6251-6258. PubMed ID: 33128077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perioperative fluid dynamics evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analysis predict infectious surgical complications after esophagectomy.
    Oya S; Yamashita H; Iwata R; Kawasaki K; Tanabe A; Yagi K; Aikou S; Seto Y
    BMC Surg; 2019 Dec; 19(1):184. PubMed ID: 31791292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preventing anastomotic complications: early results of laparoscopic gastric devascularization two weeks prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Strosberg DS; Merritt RE; Perry KA
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 27495339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The perioperative presepsin as an accurate diagnostic marker of postoperative infectious complications after esophagectomy: a prospective cohort study.
    Takeuchi M; Yokose T; Kawakubo H; Matsuda S; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Obara H; Kitagawa Y
    Esophagus; 2020 Oct; 17(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 32303873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Evaluation of the perioperative period and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive LTE and minimally invasive CTLE esophagectomy for stage Ⅰ-Ⅲ cervical esophageal carcinoma based on propensity score matching analysis].
    Yu Z; Yu L; Chen XH; Yu T; Zhang BX; Yang XG; Du X; Gao X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 102(5):357-362. PubMed ID: 35092977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.