These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35683613)

  • 1. Alternative Insertion Site of Nexplanon: Description of a Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Stabile G; Foti C; Mordeglia D; De Santo D; Mangino FP; Laganà AS; Ricci G
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jun; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 35683613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real world data on Nexplanon® procedure-related events: final results from the Nexplanon Observational Risk Assessment study (NORA).
    Reed S; Do Minh T; Lange JA; Koro C; Fox M; Heinemann K
    Contraception; 2019 Jul; 100(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 30980829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Safety profile of etonogestrel contraceptive implant (Nexplanon
    Simon C; Agier MS; Béné J; Muller C; Vrignaud L; Marret H; Jonville-Bera AP
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1074-1082. PubMed ID: 27125380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternative insertion site in the scapular region for etonogestrel contraceptive implant (Nexplanon
    Pragout D; Darrouzain F; Marret H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 May; 224():207-208. PubMed ID: 29615330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with removal difficulties of etonogestrel-containing contraceptive implants (Nexplanon
    Chevreau J; Krief D; Abou Arab O; Zitoun M; Foulon A; Sergent F; Gondry J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 May; 224():81-84. PubMed ID: 29554605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.
    Rocca ML; Palumbo AR; Visconti F; Di Carlo C
    Pharmaceuticals (Basel); 2021 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 34201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contraceptive Implant Insertion and Removal.
    Gilbert BG
    Prim Care; 2021 Dec; 48(4):545-554. PubMed ID: 34752268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.
    Ireland LD; Goyal V; Raker CA; Murray A; Allen RH
    Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 24973904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Six- and twelve-month documented removal rates among women electing postpartum inpatient compared to delayed or interval contraceptive implant insertions after Medicaid payment reform.
    Crockett AH; Pickell LB; Heberlein EC; Billings DL; Mills B
    Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27400823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nexplanon removal from intramuscular implantation in biceps: case report.
    Kong AC; Alfonso MN; Pineda DE; Thorpe MS; Miki RA
    Radiol Case Rep; 2021 Dec; 16(12):3973-3976. PubMed ID: 34729127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Migration of a subdermal contraceptive implant into a subsegmental pulmonary artery and etonogestrel serum concentration over time - a case report.
    Kafi Mallak F; Kopp Kallner H
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2022 Jun; 27(3):261-264. PubMed ID: 35174737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous extraction of an embolized progesterone contraceptive implant from the pulmonary artery.
    Akhtar MM; Bhan A; Lim ZY; Akhtar MA; Sekhri N; Bharadwaj P; Mullen M
    Open Access J Contracept; 2018; 9():57-61. PubMed ID: 30140161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nexplanon: the new implant for long-term contraception. A comprehensive descriptive review.
    Palomba S; Falbo A; Di Cello A; Materazzo C; Zullo F
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 Sep; 28(9):710-21. PubMed ID: 22339096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extended use up to 5 years of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implant: comparison to levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal implant.
    Ali M; Akin A; Bahamondes L; Brache V; Habib N; Landoulsi S; Hubacher D;
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2491-2498. PubMed ID: 27671673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Etonogestrel contraceptive implant-associated secondary anorgasmia.
    Chapa HO; Ramirez A; Dawson D
    Contraception; 2017 Oct; 96(4):254-256. PubMed ID: 28666796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant site Nexplanon reaction?
    Pedroso C; Martins I; Palma F; Machado AI
    BMJ Case Rep; 2015 May; 2015():. PubMed ID: 25953577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Etonogestrel Implant-To Leave or Stay: A Case Series.
    Thew M
    Glob Pediatr Health; 2017; 4():2333794X17738844. PubMed ID: 29204458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nexplanon, a radiopaque etonogestrel implant in combination with a next-generation applicator: 3-year results of a noncomparative multicenter trial.
    Mommers E; Blum GF; Gent TG; Peters KP; Sørdal TS; Marintcheva-Petrova M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 207(5):388.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22939402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls.
    Bahamondes L; Brache V; Meirik O; Ali M; Habib N; Landoulsi S;
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2527-38. PubMed ID: 26409014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of traditional anesthesia method and jet injector anesthesia method (MadaJet XL®) for Nexplanon® insertion and removal.
    Wilson GA; Jeter JW; Dabbs WS; Stevens AB; Heidel RE; Chamberlin SM
    Contracept Reprod Med; 2020; 5():1. PubMed ID: 32123573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.