These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3568471)

  • 1. Intermediate results of a straight stem prosthesis in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Goodman SB; Schatzker J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 May; (218):111-22. PubMed ID: 3568471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up.
    Callaghan JJ; Salvati EA; Pellicci PM; Wilson PD; Ranawat CS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1985 Sep; 67(7):1074-85. PubMed ID: 4030826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Trč T; Stastný E
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
    Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. Radiographic analysis of eighty-three primary hip replacements at a minimum of five years.
    Schmalzried TP; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Sep; 74(8):1130-9. PubMed ID: 1400541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further follow-up on socket fixation using a metal-backed acetabular component for total hip replacement. A minimum ten-year follow-up study.
    Harris WH; Penenberg BL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1987 Oct; 69(8):1140-3. PubMed ID: 3667642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of outcome of total hip arthroplasty based on initial postoperative radiographic analysis. Matched, paired comparisons of failed versus successful femoral components.
    Tapadiya D; Walker RH; Schurman DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Jun; (186):5-15. PubMed ID: 6723160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Thomas BJ; Jinnah R; Kim W; Grogan T; Yale C
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1984 Feb; 66(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 6693450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple revisions for failed total hip arthroplasty not associated with infection.
    Kavanagh BF; Fitzgerald RH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1987 Oct; 69(8):1144-9. PubMed ID: 3667643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Müller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties.
    Sutherland CJ; Wilde AH; Borden LS; Marks KE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1982 Sep; 64(7):970-82. PubMed ID: 7118985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cementless ceramic hip arthroplasties in patients less than 30 years old.
    Hyder N; Nevelos AB; Barabas TG
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Sep; 11(6):679-86. PubMed ID: 8884443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision hip surgery using the straight-stem Muller prosthesis.
    Goodman SB; Schatzker J
    J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 3612143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kavanagh BF; Ilstrup DM; Fitzgerald RH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1985 Apr; 67(4):517-26. PubMed ID: 3980495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component.
    McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18519323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision total hip replacement using the bias proximal porous-coated femoral component.
    Suominen S; Santavirta S
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1996; 85(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 9014065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High hip center in revision arthroplasty.
    Kelley SS
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Oct; 9(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 7807108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The CAD hip arthroplasty. Five to ten-year follow-up.
    Thomas BJ; Salvati EA; Small RD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Jun; 68(5):640-6. PubMed ID: 3722220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Prospective analysis of the tri-lock femoral component.
    Smith SE; Garvin KL; Jardon OM; Kaplan PA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Aug; (269):43-50. PubMed ID: 1864055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.