176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35685632)
1. Prediction of Aortic Stenosis Progression by
Murtazalieva P; Ryzhkova D; Malev E; Zhiduleva E; Moiseeva O
Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():909975. PubMed ID: 35685632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Multimodality Imaging of Aortic Valve Calcification and Function in a Murine Model of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease and Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
Ahmad AA; Ghim M; Toczek J; Neishabouri A; Ojha D; Zhang Z; Gona K; Raza MZ; Jung JJ; Kukreja G; Zhang J; Guerrera N; Liu C; Sadeghi MM
J Nucl Med; 2023 Sep; 64(9):1487-1494. PubMed ID: 37321825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Implications of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve Phenotype on Progression of Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Ascending Aorta Dilatation.
Chew NWS; Phua K; Ho YJ; Zhang A; Lin N; Ngiam JN; Lau YX; Teo VXY; Sia CH; Loh PH; Kuntjoro I; Wong RCC; Lee CH; Tan HC; Yeo TC; Kong WKF; Poh KK
Am J Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 161():76-83. PubMed ID: 34627597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis and the Effect of Vitamin K2 on Calcification Using
Peeters FECM; van Mourik MJW; Meex SJR; Bucerius J; Schalla SM; Gerretsen SC; Mihl C; Dweck MR; Schurgers LJ; Wildberger JE; Crijns HJGM; Kietselaer BLJH
Nutrients; 2018 Mar; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 29561783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.
Ye Z; Clavel MA; Foley TA; Pibarot P; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
Heart; 2024 Mar; 110(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 37903555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex-Specific Differences in Aortic Valve Calcification Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Severe Aortic Stenosis.
Veulemans V; Hokken TW; Heermann J; Kardys I; Maier O; Adrichem R; Ooms J; Nuis RJ; Daemen J; Hirsch A; Budde RP; Zeus T; Van Mieghem NM
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Jun; 197():87-92. PubMed ID: 37137798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis.
Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Larose É; Bédard É; Arsenault M; Chetaille P; Dumesnil JG; Mathieu P; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27504001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lipoprotein(a) has no major impact on calcification activity in patients with mild to moderate aortic valve stenosis.
Kaiser Y; Nurmohamed NS; Kroon J; Verberne HJ; Tzolos E; Dweck MR; Somsen AG; Arsenault BJ; Stroes ESG; Zheng KH; Boekholdt SM
Heart; 2022 Jan; 108(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 34593533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Usefulness of [
Sorysz D; Januszek R; Sowa-Staszczak A; Grochowska A; Opalińska M; Bagieński M; Zawiślak B; Dziewierz A; Tokarek T; Krawczyk-Ożóg A; Bartuś S; Dudek D
J Clin Med; 2021 Jan; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 33499425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Steady flow hemodynamic and energy loss measurements in normal and simulated calcified tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves.
Seaman C; Akingba AG; Sucosky P
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24474392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
De Azevedo D; Geers J; Gheysens O; Dweck M; Vancraeynest D
Semin Nucl Med; 2023 Mar; 53(2):241-257. PubMed ID: 36116988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Higher rate of aortic stenosis progression in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve - A single center experience.
Hamala P; Kasprzak JD; Lipiec P; Sobczak-Kaleta M; Wierzbowska-Drabik K
Adv Med Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(2):343-350. PubMed ID: 34280706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the aortic valve calcium content in the bicuspid and tricuspid stenotic aortic valve using non-enhanced 64-detector-row-computed tomography with prospective ECG-triggering.
Ferda J; Linhartová K; Kreuzberg B
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):471-5. PubMed ID: 17961946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aortic Stenosis Progression, Cardiac Damage, and Survival: Comparison Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
Yang LT; Boler A; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Maurer MJ; Eleid MF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Tribouilloy C; Michelena HI
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun; 14(6):1113-1126. PubMed ID: 33744153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype on progression of aortic stenosis.
Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Arsenault M; Bédard É; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jul; 21(7):727-734. PubMed ID: 32386199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ex vivo assessment of valve thickness/calcification of patients with calcific aortic stenosis in relation to in vivo clinical outcomes.
Cheng CL; Chang HH; Huang PJ; Wang WC; Lin SY
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():324-332. PubMed ID: 28651163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of procedural, clinical and valve performance results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.
Liao YB; Li YJ; Xiong TY; Ou YW; Lv WY; He JL; Li YM; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Feng Y; Chen M
Int J Cardiol; 2018 Mar; 254():69-74. PubMed ID: 29246428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of aortic
Cecelja M; Moore A; Fogelman I; Frost ML; Blake GM; Chowienczyk P
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis; 2019; 8():2048004019848870. PubMed ID: 31105936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of
Rojulpote C; Borja AJ; Zhang V; Aly M; Koa B; Seraj SM; Raynor WY; Kothekar E; Kaghazchi F; Werner TJ; Gerke O; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Alavi A
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020; 10(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 32211218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stenotic Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves - Micro-Computed Tomography and Biological Indices of Calcification.
Mazur P; Wypasek E; Gawęda B; Sobczyk D; Kapusta P; Natorska J; Malinowski KP; Tarasiuk J; Bochenek M; Wroński S; Chmielewska K; Kapelak B; Undas A
Circ J; 2017 Jun; 81(7):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 28344201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
