These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35686374)

  • 21. Improving the performance of an aerobic membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating pharmaceutical wastewater with powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition.
    Kaya Y; Bacaksiz AM; Golebatmaz U; Vergili I; Gönder ZB; Yilmaz G
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2016 Apr; 39(4):661-76. PubMed ID: 26846538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of sludge retention times on reactivity of effluent dissolved organic matter for trihalomethane formation in hybrid powdered activated carbon membrane bioreactors.
    Ma D; Gao B; Xia C; Wang Y; Yue Q; Li Q
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 166():381-8. PubMed ID: 24929809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combined effects of EPS and HRT enhanced biofouling on a submerged and hybrid PAC-MF membrane bioreactor.
    Khan MM; Takizawa S; Lewandowski Z; Habibur Rahman M; Komatsu K; Nelson SE; Kurisu F; Camper AK; Katayama H; Ohgaki S
    Water Res; 2013 Feb; 47(2):747-57. PubMed ID: 23218247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimization of membrane bioreactors by the addition of powdered activated carbon.
    Ng CA; Sun D; Bashir MJ; Wai SH; Wong LY; Nisar H; Wu B; Fane AG
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jun; 138():38-47. PubMed ID: 23612160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor in which granular sludge and dynamic filtration are integrated.
    Yang J; Ji X; Lu L; Ma H; Chen Y; Guo J; Fang F
    Biofouling; 2017 Jan; 33(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 27911097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon.
    Whang GD; Cho YM; Park H; Jang JG
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):451-7. PubMed ID: 15137457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of powdered activated carbon (PAC) on MBR performance and effluent trihalomethane formation: At the initial stage of PAC addition.
    Gao Y; Ma D; Yue Q; Gao B; Huang X
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 216():838-44. PubMed ID: 27318162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance enhancement with powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating distillery effluent.
    Satyawali Y; Balakrishnan M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):457-65. PubMed ID: 19467782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of microbial communities of activated sludge and membrane biofilm in 10 full-scale membrane bioreactors.
    Jo SJ; Kwon H; Jeong SY; Lee CH; Kim TG
    Water Res; 2016 Sep; 101():214-225. PubMed ID: 27262549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance improvement of hybrid membrane bioreactor with PAC addition for water reuse.
    Liu Y; Wang L; Wang B; Cui H; Zhang J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):383-91. PubMed ID: 16459813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of inorganic particles and their interactions with biofilms on dynamic membrane structure and long-term filtration performance.
    Jiang L; Yu Y; Liu G
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 780():146639. PubMed ID: 33773340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of support material pore size on the filtration behavior of dynamic membrane bioreactor.
    Cai D; Huang J; Liu G; Li M; Yu Y; Meng F
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 May; 255():359-363. PubMed ID: 29433772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Super-fine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) for efficient removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent.
    Bonvin F; Jost L; Randin L; Bonvin E; Kohn T
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():90-99. PubMed ID: 26724443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term effect on membrane fouling in a new membrane bioreactor as a pretreatment to seawater desalination.
    Jeong S; Rice SA; Vigneswaran S
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():60-8. PubMed ID: 24745896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biofouling and control approaches in membrane bioreactors.
    Deng L; Guo W; Ngo HH; Zhang H; Wang J; Li J; Xia S; Wu Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Dec; 221():656-665. PubMed ID: 27717560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of powdered activated carbon on the performance of an aerobic membrane bioreactor: comparison between cross-flow and submerged membrane systems.
    Kim JS; Lee CH
    Water Environ Res; 2003; 75(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 12934823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characterization of the archaeal community fouling a membrane bioreactor.
    Luo J; Zhang J; Tan X; McDougald D; Zhuang G; Fane AG; Kjelleberg S; Cohen Y; Rice SA
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Mar; 29():115-23. PubMed ID: 25766019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do biological-based strategies hold promise to biofouling control in MBRs?
    Malaeb L; Le-Clech P; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ayoub GM; Saikaly PE
    Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(15):5447-63. PubMed ID: 23863390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in the physical properties of the dynamic layer and its correlation with permeate quality in a self-forming dynamic membrane bioreactor.
    Guan D; Dai J; Watanabe Y; Chen G
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 140():67-76. PubMed ID: 29689444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.