These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35687607)

  • 1. Socioeconomic status differences in psychological responses to unfair treatments: Behavioral evidence of a vicious cycle.
    Kim Y; Jung J; Na J
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0268286. PubMed ID: 35687607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity.
    Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Mifune N; Hashimoto H; Li Y; Shinada M; Miura A; Inukai K; Takagishi H; Simunovic D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Dec; 109(50):20364-8. PubMed ID: 23188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Punishing the privileged: Selfish offers from high-status allocators elicit greater punishment from third-party arbitrators.
    Mattan BD; Barth DM; Thompson A; FeldmanHall O; Cloutier J; Kubota JT
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232369. PubMed ID: 32407328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural correlates of decision making after unfair treatment.
    Wu Y; Zang Y; Yuan B; Tian X
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():123. PubMed ID: 25798102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment.
    Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Takagishi H; Shinada M; Tanida S; Cook KS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jul; 106(28):11520-3. PubMed ID: 19564602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game.
    Brañas-Garza P; Espín AM; Exadaktylos F; Herrmann B
    Sci Rep; 2014 Aug; 4():6025. PubMed ID: 25113502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Socioeconomic status and differential psychological and immune responses to a human-caused disaster.
    Jiang Y; Zilioli S; Rodriguez-Stanley J; Peek KM; Cutchin MP
    Brain Behav Immun; 2020 Aug; 88():935-939. PubMed ID: 32445787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lower dorsal striatum activation in association with neuroticism during the acceptance of unfair offers.
    Servaas MN; Aleman A; Marsman JB; Renken RJ; Riese H; Ormel J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 25720857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association Between Polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) of the Serotonin Transporter Gene and Behavioral Response to Unfair Distribution.
    Nishina K; Shou Q; Takahashi H; Sakagami M; Inoue-Murayama M; Takagishi H
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2022; 16():762092. PubMed ID: 35368308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generosity in dictator game and social value orientation predicted the type of costly punishment in ultimatum game.
    Li J; Cheng N; Hou W
    Psych J; 2021 Aug; 10(4):625-634. PubMed ID: 33594817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying norm-enforcement behaviors under social observation.
    Ouyang H; Sun F; Che L; Zhang W; Cheng X; Zheng L
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 May; 238(5):1311-1321. PubMed ID: 32318750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others?
    van 't Wout M; Faught S; Menino D
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():880. PubMed ID: 24348438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Socioeconomic status, perceived control, diurnal cortisol, and physical symptoms: A moderated mediation model.
    Zilioli S; Imami L; Slatcher RB
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2017 Jan; 75():36-43. PubMed ID: 27768982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testosterone Administration Related Differences in Brain Activation during the Ultimatum Game.
    Kopsida E; Berrebi J; Petrovic P; Ingvar M
    Front Neurosci; 2016; 10():66. PubMed ID: 26973448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
    Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.