234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35688189)
1. A systematic approach towards optimization of brackish groundwater treatment using nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) hybrid membrane filtration system.
Srivastava A; Singh R; Rajput VD; Minkina T; Agarwal S; Garg MC
Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135230. PubMed ID: 35688189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for the performance evaluation of pilot-scale hybrid nanofiltration (NF) & reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system for the treatment of brackish ground water.
Srivastava A; K A; Nair A; Ram S; Agarwal S; Ali J; Singh R; Garg MC
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111497. PubMed ID: 33130432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new approach for optimization of small-scale RO membrane using artificial groundwater.
Garg MC; Joshi H
Environ Technol; 2014; 35(21-24):2988-99. PubMed ID: 25189847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the hybrid system combining electrocoagulation, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for biologically treated textile effluent: Treatment efficiency and membrane fouling.
Güneş E; Gönder ZB
J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():113042. PubMed ID: 34126531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of commercial nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane filtration to remove per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effects of transmembrane pressures and water matrices.
Ma Q; Lei Q; Liu F; Song Z; Khusid B; Zhang W
Water Environ Res; 2024 Feb; 96(2):e10983. PubMed ID: 38291820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of reject water in decentralized community RO plants by devising an integrated treatment scheme of NF and RO by pilot-scale analysis.
Saxena K; Brighu U; Jain S; Meena A
J Environ Manage; 2023 Apr; 331():117094. PubMed ID: 36630801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Desalination of brackish groundwater and reuse of wastewater by forward osmosis coupled with nanofiltration for draw solution recovery.
Giagnorio M; Ricceri F; Tiraferri A
Water Res; 2019 Apr; 153():134-143. PubMed ID: 30708192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inorganic fouling mitigation by salinity cycling in batch reverse osmosis.
Warsinger DM; Tow EW; Maswadeh LA; Connors GB; Swaminathan J; Lienhard V JH
Water Res; 2018 Jun; 137():384-394. PubMed ID: 29573825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Desalination, Water Re-use, and Halophyte Cultivation in Salinized Regions: A Highly Productive Groundwater Treatment System.
Park K; Mudgal A; Mudgal V; Sagi M; Standing D; Davies PA
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Aug; 57(32):11863-11875. PubMed ID: 37540002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. UTEP-EPW university-utility partnership: Concentrate enhanced-recovery reverse osmosis process for high water recovery from silica-saturated desalination concentrates.
Tarquin A; Walker WS; Delgado G; Bustamante A
Water Environ Res; 2020 Mar; 92(3):369-377. PubMed ID: 31276246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Renewable energy powered membrane technology. 1. Development and characterization of a photovoltaic hybrid membrane system.
Schäfer AI; Broeckmann A; Richards BS
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(3):998-1003. PubMed ID: 17328215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-parametric assessment of biological stability of drinking water produced from groundwater: Reverse osmosis vs. conventional treatment.
Sousi M; Liu G; Salinas-Rodriguez SG; Chen L; Dusseldorp J; Wessels P; Schippers JC; Kennedy MD; van der Meer W
Water Res; 2020 Nov; 186():116317. PubMed ID: 32841931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of salt accumulation in the bioreactor on the performance of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+Reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation.
Tay MF; Lee S; Xu H; Jeong K; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
Water Res; 2020 Mar; 170():115352. PubMed ID: 31812816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
