These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35689168)

  • 1. Offline dominance and zeugmatic similarity normings of variably ambiguous words assessed against a neural language model (BERT).
    DeLong KA; Trott S; Kutas M
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):1537-1557. PubMed ID: 35689168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupillometric and behavioural evidence shows no differences between polyseme and homonym processing.
    Haro J; López-Cortés N; Ferré P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Aug; 238():103985. PubMed ID: 37453281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature.
    Eddington CM; Tokowicz N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):13-37. PubMed ID: 24889119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Semantic Similarity on Learning Ambiguous Words in a Second Language: An Event-Related Potential Study.
    Zhang Y; Lu Y; Liang L; Chen B
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1633. PubMed ID: 32765371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
    MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of homonym meaning frequency estimates derived from movie and television subtitles, free association, and explicit ratings.
    Rice CA; Beekhuizen B; Dubrovsky V; Stevenson S; Armstrong BC
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1399-1425. PubMed ID: 30203161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.
    Li J; Joanisse MF
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of representational distance between meanings on the neural correlates of semantic ambiguity.
    Grindrod CM; Garnett EO; Malyutina S; den Ouden DB
    Brain Lang; 2014 Dec; 139():23-35. PubMed ID: 25463814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing of irregular polysemes in sentence reading.
    Brocher A; Foraker S; Koenig JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 27065198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probing the Representational Structure of Regular Polysemy via Sense Analogy Questions: Insights from Contextual Word Vectors.
    Li J; Armstrong BC
    Cogn Sci; 2024 Mar; 48(3):e13416. PubMed ID: 38482721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tracking competition and cognitive control during language comprehension with multi-voxel pattern analysis.
    Musz E; Thompson-Schill SL
    Brain Lang; 2017 Feb; 165():21-32. PubMed ID: 27898341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. eDom: norming software and relative meaning frequencies for 544 English homonyms.
    Armstrong BC; Tokowicz N; Plaut DC
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1015-27. PubMed ID: 22477438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.
    Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA; Rogers TT
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):718-30. PubMed ID: 23239067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processing of Translation-Ambiguous Words by Chinese-English Bilinguals in Sentence Context.
    Zhou G; Chen Y; Feng Y; Zhou R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Oct; 48(5):1133-1161. PubMed ID: 31127440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining the Relativity of Word Meanings Through the Construction of Individualized Models of Semantic Memory.
    Johns BT
    Cogn Sci; 2024 Feb; 48(2):e13413. PubMed ID: 38402448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative meaning frequencies for 578 homonyms in two Spanish dialects: A cross-linguistic extension of the English eDom norms.
    Armstrong BC; Zugarramurdi C; Cabana Á; Valle Lisboa J; Plaut DC
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):950-62. PubMed ID: 26276519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-language activation and executive control modulate within-language ambiguity resolution: Evidence from eye movements.
    Palma P; Whitford V; Titone D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):507-528. PubMed ID: 31282724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs.
    Twilley LC; Dixon P; Taylor D; Clark K
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Jan; 22(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 8035680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.