These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35689633)

  • 1. Species Tree Estimation and the Impact of Gene Loss Following Whole-Genome Duplication.
    Xiong H; Wang D; Shao C; Yang X; Yang J; Ma T; Davis CC; Liu L; Xi Z
    Syst Biol; 2022 Oct; 71(6):1348-1361. PubMed ID: 35689633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Missing Data on Species Tree Estimation.
    Xi Z; Liu L; Davis CC
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Mar; 33(3):838-60. PubMed ID: 26589995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coalescent-Based Analyses of Genomic Sequence Data Provide a Robust Resolution of Phylogenetic Relationships among Major Groups of Gibbons.
    Shi CM; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):159-179. PubMed ID: 29087487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Frequency and Topology of Pseudoorthologs.
    Smith ML; Hahn MW
    Syst Biol; 2022 Apr; 71(3):649-659. PubMed ID: 34951639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To Include or Not to Include: The Impact of Gene Filtering on Species Tree Estimation Methods.
    Molloy EK; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):285-303. PubMed ID: 29029338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of SVDquartets and other coalescent-based species tree estimation methods.
    Chou J; Gupta A; Yaduvanshi S; Davidson R; Nute M; Mirarab S; Warnow T
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S2. PubMed ID: 26449249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of coalescent-based species tree estimation methods under models of missing data.
    Nute M; Chou J; Molloy EK; Warnow T
    BMC Genomics; 2018 May; 19(Suppl 5):286. PubMed ID: 29745854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Species Tree Inference Methods Intended to Deal with Incomplete Lineage Sorting Are Robust to the Presence of Paralogs.
    Yan Z; Smith ML; Du P; Hahn MW; Nakhleh L
    Syst Biol; 2022 Feb; 71(2):367-381. PubMed ID: 34245291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating Summary Methods for Multilocus Species Tree Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Lineage Sorting.
    Mirarab S; Bayzid MS; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2016 May; 65(3):366-80. PubMed ID: 25164915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian-Weighted Triplet and Quartet Methods for Species Tree Inference.
    Richards A; Kubatko L
    Bull Math Biol; 2021 Jul; 83(9):93. PubMed ID: 34297209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theoretical and Practical Considerations when using Retroelement Insertions to Estimate Species Trees in the Anomaly Zone.
    Molloy EK; Gatesy J; Springer MS
    Syst Biol; 2022 Apr; 71(3):721-740. PubMed ID: 34677617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. STELAR: a statistically consistent coalescent-based species tree estimation method by maximizing triplet consistency.
    Islam M; Sarker K; Das T; Reaz R; Bayzid MS
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 32039704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing species tree estimation with large anchored phylogenomic and small Sanger-sequenced molecular datasets: an empirical study on Malagasy pseudoxyrhophiine snakes.
    Ruane S; Raxworthy CJ; Lemmon AR; Lemmon EM; Burbrink FT
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Oct; 15():221. PubMed ID: 26459325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phylogenomic species tree estimation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting and horizontal gene transfer.
    Davidson R; Vachaspati P; Mirarab S; Warnow T
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S1. PubMed ID: 26450506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coalescent methods are robust to the simultaneous effects of long branches and incomplete lineage sorting.
    Liu L; Xi Z; Davis CC
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Mar; 32(3):791-805. PubMed ID: 25431481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Counting and sampling gene family evolutionary histories in the duplication-loss and duplication-loss-transfer models.
    Chauve C; Ponty Y; Wallner M
    J Math Biol; 2020 Apr; 80(5):1353-1388. PubMed ID: 32060618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inconsistency of Species Tree Methods under Gene Flow.
    Solís-Lemus C; Yang M; Ané C
    Syst Biol; 2016 Sep; 65(5):843-51. PubMed ID: 27151419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polynomial-Time Statistical Estimation of Species Trees Under Gene Duplication and Loss.
    Legried B; Molloy EK; Warnow T; Roch S
    J Comput Biol; 2021 May; 28(5):452-468. PubMed ID: 33325781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers.
    Carstens BC; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17520504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.