156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35690935)
41. A Cohort Analysis of Early Outcomes After AlloDerm, FlexHD, and SurgiMend Use in Two-Stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Chu JJ; Nelson JA; Kokosis G; Haglich K; McKernan CD; Rubenstein R; Vingan PS; Allen RJ; Coriddi MR; Dayan JH; Disa JJ; Mehrara BJ; Matros E
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):1491-1498. PubMed ID: 37551639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A Meta-analysis of Postoperative Complications of Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Zhao X; Wu X; Dong J; Liu Y; Zheng L; Zhang L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):892-901. PubMed ID: 26377821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted, Prosthesis-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of SurgiMend PRS, AlloDerm, and DermACELL.
Berger LE; Spoer DL; Huffman SS; Haffner ZK; Tom LK; Parkih RP; Song DH; Fan KL
Ann Plast Surg; 2024 Jul; 93(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 38885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.
Sorkin M; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1091-1100. PubMed ID: 28806288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications.
Chun YS; Verma K; Rosen H; Lipsitz S; Morris D; Kenney P; Eriksson E
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Feb; 125(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 20124828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Acellular bovine pericardium dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction after Skin Sparing Mastectomy.
Gubitosi A; Docimo G; Parmeggiani D; Pirozzi R; Vitiello C; Schettino P; Avellino M; Casalino G; Amato M; Ruggiero R; Docimo L
Int J Surg; 2014; 12 Suppl 1():S205-8. PubMed ID: 24859403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases.
Hille-Betz U; Kniebusch N; Wojcinski S; Henseler H; Heyl V; Ohlinger R; Paepke S; Klapdor R; Krause-Bergmann B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1146-52. PubMed ID: 25300607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Complication rates of acellular dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction with radiation: A single-institution retrospective comparison study.
Stein MJ; Chung A; Arnaout A; Ghaedi B; Ghumman A; Zhang T; Zhang J
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Dec; 73(12):2156-2163. PubMed ID: 32561384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. National Trends in Acellular Dermal Matrix Utilization in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Graziano FD; Plotsker EL; Rubenstein RN; Haglich K; Stern CS; Matros E; Nelson JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jan; 153(1):25e-36e. PubMed ID: 37092982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Complication prevalence following use of tutoplast-derived human acellular dermal matrix in prosthetic breast reconstruction: a retrospective review of 203 patients.
Rundell VL; Beck RT; Wang CE; Gutowski KA; Sisco M; Fenner G; Howard MA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1345-51. PubMed ID: 24917371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction.
Cassileth L; Kohanzadeh S; Amersi F
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 69(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 21734545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of a novel breast reconstruction technique using the Braxon
Berna G; Cawthorn SJ; Papaccio G; Balestrieri N
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jun; 87(6):493-498. PubMed ID: 25266930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.
Chandarana M; Harries S;
BJS Open; 2020 Feb; 4(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 32011819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Dermal Autograft Using Donor Breast as Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Review.
North WD; Kubajak CS; St Martin B; Rinker B
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 78(6S Suppl 5):S282-S285. PubMed ID: 28296716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction.
Ho G; Nguyen TJ; Shahabi A; Hwang BH; Chan LS; Wong AK
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 68(4):346-56. PubMed ID: 22421476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
Ball JF; Sheena Y; Tarek Saleh DM; Forouhi P; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Malata CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 28624524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Outcome Assessment According to the Thickness and Direction of the Acellular Dermal Matrix after Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Hur J; Han HH
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():8101009. PubMed ID: 34825003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A large-volume academic center retrospective audit of the temporal evolution of immediate breast reconstruction protocols and the effect on breast prosthetic infection.
Manahan MA; McNichols CH; Bello RJ; Giuliano K; Xie S; von Guionneau N; Ahn J; Rosson GD; Hui-Chou HG
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 30553779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement.
Hanna KR; DeGeorge BR; Mericli AF; Lin KY; Drake DB
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21862915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
