137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35692283)
1. Direct quantification of epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty in 3D U-net segmentation.
Jones CK; Wang G; Yedavalli V; Sair H
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2022 May; 9(3):034002. PubMed ID: 35692283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with oropharyngeal cancer by using a convolutional neural network with associated epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty.
Dohopolski M; Chen L; Sher D; Wang J
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(22):225002. PubMed ID: 33179605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uncertainty estimation using a 3D probabilistic U-Net for segmentation with small radiotherapy clinical trial datasets.
Chlap P; Min H; Dowling J; Field M; Cloak K; Leong T; Lee M; Chu J; Tan J; Tran P; Kron T; Sidhom M; Wiltshire K; Keats S; Kneebone A; Haworth A; Ebert MA; Vinod SK; Holloway L
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2024 Jun; 116():102403. PubMed ID: 38878632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks.
Wang G; Li W; Aertsen M; Deprest J; Ourselin S; Vercauteren T
Neurocomputing (Amst); 2019 Sep; 335():34-45. PubMed ID: 31595105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation of the effect of fat suppression and dimensionality on the accuracy of breast MRI segmentation using U-nets.
Fashandi H; Kuling G; Lu Y; Wu H; Martel AL
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1230-1244. PubMed ID: 30609062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of uncertainty estimation and decomposition methods on liver segmentation.
Cangalovic VS; Thielke F; Meine H
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2024 Feb; 19(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 37584850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrinsic randomness in epidemic modelling beyond statistical uncertainty.
Penn MJ; Laydon DJ; Penn J; Whittaker C; Morgenstern C; Ratmann O; Mishra S; Pakkanen MS; Donnelly CA; Bhatt S
Commun Phys; 2023; 6(1):146. PubMed ID: 38665405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Graph neural network interatomic potential ensembles with calibrated aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty on energy and forces.
Busk J; Schmidt MN; Winther O; Vegge T; Jørgensen PB
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2023 Sep; 25(37):25828-25837. PubMed ID: 37724552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive uncertainty in deep learning-based MR image reconstruction using deep ensembles: Evaluation on the fastMRI data set.
Küstner T; Hammernik K; Rueckert D; Hepp T; Gatidis S
Magn Reson Med; 2024 Jul; 92(1):289-302. PubMed ID: 38282254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unified Bayesian network for uncertainty quantification of physiological parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI of the liver.
Dejene EM; Brenner W; Makowski MR; Kolbitsch C
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Nov; 68(21):. PubMed ID: 37820640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of fully automated myocardial segmentation techniques in native and contrast-enhanced T1-mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using fully convolutional neural networks.
Farrag NA; Lochbihler A; White JA; Ukwatta E
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):215-226. PubMed ID: 33131085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Leveraging voxel-wise segmentation uncertainty to improve reliability in assessment of paediatric dysplasia of the hip.
Kannan A; Hodgson A; Mulpuri K; Garbi R
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Jul; 16(7):1121-1129. PubMed ID: 33966168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a fuzzy-stochastic nonlinear model to incorporate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.
Li H; Zhang K
J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jan; 111(1-4):1-12. PubMed ID: 19945767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Segmentation and accuracy validation of mandibular molar and pulp cavity on cone-beam CT images by U-net neural network].
Lin X; Fu YJ; Ren GQ; Wen JH; Chen YF; Zhang Q
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2022 Oct; 31(5):454-459. PubMed ID: 36758590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aleatory-aware deep uncertainty quantification for transfer learning.
Kabir HMD; Khanam S; Khozeimeh F; Khosravi A; Mondal SK; Nahavandi S; Acharya UR
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Apr; 143():105246. PubMed ID: 35131610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian deep learning method for freeway incident detection with uncertainty quantification.
Liu G; Jin H; Li J; Hu X; Li J
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106796. PubMed ID: 35985178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncertainty Estimation in Unsupervised MR-CT Synthesis of Scoliotic Spines.
Karthik EN; Cheriet F; Laporte C
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol; 2024; 5():421-427. PubMed ID: 38899021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of dataset size, image quality, and image type on deep learning-based automatic prostate segmentation in 3D ultrasound.
Orlando N; Gyacskov I; Gillies DJ; Guo F; Romagnoli C; D'Souza D; Cool DW; Hoover DA; Fenster A
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Mar; 67(7):. PubMed ID: 35240585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic brain segmentation in preterm infants with post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus using 3D Bayesian U-Net.
Largent A; De Asis-Cruz J; Kapse K; Barnett SD; Murnick J; Basu S; Andersen N; Norman S; Andescavage N; Limperopoulos C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Apr; 43(6):1895-1916. PubMed ID: 35023255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applications of Bayesian Neural Networks in Outlier Detection.
Tao C
Big Data; 2023 Oct; 11(5):369-386. PubMed ID: 36706252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
