170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35694236)
21. 3D gel-printed porous magnesium scaffold coated with dibasic calcium phosphate dihydrate for bone repair in vivo.
Zhang Y; Lin T; Meng H; Wang X; Peng H; Liu G; Wei S; Lu Q; Wang Y; Wang A; Xu W; Shao H; Peng J
J Orthop Translat; 2022 Mar; 33():13-23. PubMed ID: 35198379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 3D-printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for trabecular bone repair and regeneration: scaffold and native bone characterization.
Velioglu ZB; Pulat D; Demirbakan B; Ozcan B; Bayrak E; Erisken C
Connect Tissue Res; 2019 May; 60(3):274-282. PubMed ID: 30058375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Novel 3D-bioprinted Porous Nano Attapulgite Scaffolds with Good Performance for Bone Regeneration.
Wang Z; Hui A; Zhao H; Ye X; Zhang C; Wang A; Zhang C
Int J Nanomedicine; 2020; 15():6945-6960. PubMed ID: 33061361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Rational design of nonstoichiometric bioceramic scaffolds via digital light processing: tuning chemical composition and pore geometry evaluation.
Li Y; Wu R; Yu L; Shen M; Ding X; Lu F; Liu M; Yang X; Gou Z; Xu S
J Biol Eng; 2021 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 33407741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cobalt-doped bioceramic scaffolds fabricated by 3D printing show enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic properties for bone repair.
Li J; Zhao C; Liu C; Wang Z; Ling Z; Lin B; Tan B; Zhou L; Chen Y; Liu D; Zou X; Liu W
Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Jul; 20(1):70. PubMed ID: 34303371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bone tissue regeneration: The role of finely tuned pore architecture of bioactive scaffolds before clinical translation.
Wu R; Li Y; Shen M; Yang X; Zhang L; Ke X; Yang G; Gao C; Gou Z; Xu S
Bioact Mater; 2021 May; 6(5):1242-1254. PubMed ID: 33210022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Polycaprolactone- and polycaprolactone/ceramic-based 3D-bioplotted porous scaffolds for bone regeneration: A comparative study.
Gómez-Lizárraga KK; Flores-Morales C; Del Prado-Audelo ML; Álvarez-Pérez MA; Piña-Barba MC; Escobedo C
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Oct; 79():326-335. PubMed ID: 28629025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Form and functional repair of long bone using 3D-printed bioactive scaffolds.
Tovar N; Witek L; Atria P; Sobieraj M; Bowers M; Lopez CD; Cronstein BN; Coelho PG
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1986-1999. PubMed ID: 30044544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. 3D printing of metal-organic framework incorporated porous scaffolds to promote osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration.
Zhong L; Chen J; Ma Z; Feng H; Chen S; Cai H; Xue Y; Pei X; Wang J; Wan Q
Nanoscale; 2020 Dec; 12(48):24437-24449. PubMed ID: 33305769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Early osteointegration evaluation of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds designed based on triply periodic minimal surface models.
Li L; Shi J; Zhang K; Yang L; Yu F; Zhu L; Liang H; Wang X; Jiang Q
J Orthop Translat; 2019 Oct; 19():94-105. PubMed ID: 31844617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Permeability and mechanical properties of gradient porous PDMS scaffolds fabricated by 3D-printed sacrificial templates designed with minimal surfaces.
Montazerian H; Mohamed MGA; Montazeri MM; Kheiri S; Milani AS; Kim K; Hoorfar M
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 96():149-160. PubMed ID: 31252172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Strength reliability and in vitro degradation of three-dimensional powder printed strontium-substituted magnesium phosphate scaffolds.
Meininger S; Mandal S; Kumar A; Groll J; Basu B; Gbureck U
Acta Biomater; 2016 Feb; 31():401-411. PubMed ID: 26621692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 3D-Printed Bioactive Ca
Yang C; Wang X; Ma B; Zhu H; Huan Z; Ma N; Wu C; Chang J
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2017 Feb; 9(7):5757-5767. PubMed ID: 28117976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of 3D-printed Ti
Wang H; Su K; Su L; Liang P; Ji P; Wang C
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Dec; 88():488-496. PubMed ID: 30223212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of surface area and topography on 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone grafting applications.
Vu AA; Burke DA; Bandyopadhyay A; Bose S
Addit Manuf; 2021 Mar; 39():. PubMed ID: 34307059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Osteogenesis of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V implants with different pore sizes.
Ran Q; Yang W; Hu Y; Shen X; Yu Y; Xiang Y; Cai K
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Aug; 84():1-11. PubMed ID: 29709846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Integrated evaluation of biomechanical and biological properties of the biomimetic structural bone scaffold: Biomechanics, simulation analysis, and osteogenesis.
Li J; Yang Y; Sun Z; Peng K; Liu K; Xu P; Li J; Wei X; He X
Mater Today Bio; 2024 Feb; 24():100934. PubMed ID: 38234458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-Dimensional Printing of Hollow-Struts-Packed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.
Luo Y; Zhai D; Huan Z; Zhu H; Xia L; Chang J; Wu C
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Nov; 7(43):24377-83. PubMed ID: 26479454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biodegradable 3D printed HA/CMCS/PDA scaffold for repairing lacunar bone defect.
Chen T; Zou Q; Du C; Wang C; Li Y; Fu B
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Nov; 116():111148. PubMed ID: 32806300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of biomechanically stable pergola-like additively manufactured scaffold for extraskeletal vertical bone augmentation.
Yang W; Wang C; Luo W; Apicella A; Ji P; Wang G; Liu B; Fan Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1112335. PubMed ID: 37057137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
