These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35694380)

  • 1. Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models.
    Marrotte RR; Howe EJ; Beauclerc KB; Potter D; Northrup JM
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13490. PubMed ID: 35694380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
    Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating animal abundance at multiple scales by spatially explicit capture-recapture.
    Howe EJ; Potter D; Beauclerc KB; Jackson KE; Northrup JM
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Oct; 32(7):e2638. PubMed ID: 35441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.
    Carroll SL; Schmidt GM; Waller JS; Graves TA
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 38263096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved inferences about landscape connectivity from spatial capture-recapture by integration of a movement model.
    Dupont G; Linden DW; Sutherland C
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3544. PubMed ID: 34626121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trap array configuration influences estimates and precision of black bear density and abundance.
    Wilton CM; Puckett EE; Beringer J; Gardner B; Eggert LS; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e111257. PubMed ID: 25350557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity.
    Royle JA; Chandler RB; Gazenski KD; Graves TA
    Ecology; 2013 Feb; 94(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 23691647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability.
    Ruprecht JS; Eriksson CE; Forrester TD; Clark DA; Wisdom MJ; Rowland MM; Johnson BK; Levi T
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02405. PubMed ID: 34245619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating citizen science data in spatially explicit integrated population models.
    Sun CC; Royle JA; Fuller AK
    Ecology; 2019 Sep; 100(9):e02777. PubMed ID: 31168779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?
    Sollmann R; Gardner B; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34575. PubMed ID: 22539949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling spatiotemporal abundance and movement dynamics using an integrated spatial capture-recapture movement model.
    Hostetter NJ; Regehr EV; Wilson RR; Royle JA; Converse SJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3772. PubMed ID: 35633152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta.
    Boulanger J; Nielsen SE; Stenhouse GB
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5204. PubMed ID: 29581471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating population density and connectivity of American mink using spatial capture-recapture.
    Fuller AK; Sutherland CS; Royle JA; Hare MP
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Jun; 26(4):1125-35. PubMed ID: 27509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compensatory heterogeneity in spatially explicit capture-recapture data.
    Efford MG; Mowat G
    Ecology; 2014 May; 95(5):1341-8. PubMed ID: 25000765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Sun CC; Fuller AK; Royle JA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88025. PubMed ID: 24505361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Land tenure shapes black bear density and abundance on a multi-use landscape.
    Loosen AE; Morehouse AT; Boyce MS
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):73-89. PubMed ID: 30680097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayes and empirical Bayes estimators of abundance and density from spatial capture-recapture data.
    Dorazio RM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e84017. PubMed ID: 24386325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An empirical evaluation of camera trapping and spatially explicit capture-recapture models for estimating chimpanzee density.
    Després-Einspenner ML; Howe EJ; Drapeau P; Kühl HS
    Am J Primatol; 2017 Jul; 79(7):. PubMed ID: 28267880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.